On 5 August 2012 11:41, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> --- a/agent/mibgroup/utilities/execute.h
> +++ b/agent/mibgroup/utilities/execute.h
> @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
> config_belongs_in(agent_module)
>
> int run_shell_command(char *command, char *input,
> - char *output, size_t *out_len)
On 08/06/12 07:18, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 5 August 2012 11:41, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> --- a/agent/mibgroup/utilities/execute.h
>> +++ b/agent/mibgroup/utilities/execute.h
>> @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
>> config_belongs_in(agent_module)
>>
>> int run_shell_command(char *command, char *input,
>> -
On 6 August 2012 08:34, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> Doesn't this introduce a change in the API ?
>
> That change restores the API to what it has always been before July 30,
> 2012 (see also commit 7374b84fe4c2ef8497fde3dae80a69aa89eba19c). So I'm
> not breaking the API but restoring it ...
Fair eno
I'm working on an application using the net-snmp library (net-snmp-5.6-2). And
being curious, I took a look at the source code :-). Doing so I've mentioned
the use of errno to get information about failed calls to WinSock. For example
in snmpUDPBaseDomain.c:
...
rc = sendto(t->sock,
The update to agent/kernel.[ch] introduced just before pushing pre3 have
differing prototypes for klookup, and cannot compile.
I suggest the following change
--- a/agent/kernel.c
+++ b/agent/kernel.c
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ klread(char *buf, int buflen)
* @return gives 1 on success and 0 on failu
The configure test for pcre requires that you explicitly configure
--without-pcre if you are on a system without pcre support. Isn't this a
bit overreacting?
Actually, are there any reason to go for pcre for this, adding a
dependency that is not standard on BSD or Solaris (and probably AIX and
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 07:49:54PM +0200, Niels Baggesen wrote:
> The configure test for pcre requires that you explicitly configure
> --without-pcre if you are on a system without pcre support. Isn't this a
> bit overreacting?
I have noticed that as well but not gotten around to fix it.
> Actu
