Socket leak in snmpd process when trapsink is configured

Hi, We are using net-snmp version 5.4.2.1. We do see socket leakage in net-snmp when we add trap receiver to snmpd.conf file and sending a SIGHUP signal to snmpd process to update configurations. Continual update of snmpd.conf file followed by SIGHUP signal quickly makes the file descriptor

CPU usage can't be shown correctly on ver:5.2.x

Hi All I found the CPU usage can be shown almost correct on ver:5.5 but the cpu usage value is very high on ver:5.2.x How can i get correct cpu usage value from ver:5.2.x ? Any suggestions will be appreciated!!! Best regards, Brian Lu

Is it policy to strip comments from the source code that we commit?

Hi, team! I've submitted numerous patches to the net-snmp project for errors so esoteric that it took days to find and understand them. In my painful searches through the commentless code, I built up an understanding of the necessary components and added in many comments to help steer people in

Re: Is it policy to strip comments from the source code that we commit?

On Fri, 21 May 2010 19:04:43 -0400 Doug Manley doug.man...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, team! I've submitted numerous patches to the net-snmp project for errors so esoteric that it took days to find and understand them. In my painful searches through the commentless code, I built up an

Re: Is it policy to strip comments from the source code that we commit?

On Fri, 21 May 2010 19:04:43 -0400, Doug Manley doug.man...@gmail.com said: DM I've submitted numerous patches to the net-snmp project for errors so DM esoteric that it took days to find and understand them. I'd have to go back and chase the details to figure out who committed the patch, why

Re: CPU usage can't be shown correctly on ver:5.2.x

On Fri, 21 May 2010 18:34:20 +0800, Brian Lu br...@creek.com.tw said: BL How can i get correct cpu usage value from ver:5.2.x ? BL Any suggestions will be appreciated!!! The best thing to do, of course, is upgrade! Or compare the two releases and find the patch that fixes the problem. I

Re: Transport changes

On Thu, 20 May 2010 23:15:14 +0200, Magnus Fromreide ma...@lysator.liu.se said: MF With that said I have to admit to like using autoconf for things like MF this. But that goes against all the other modular additions that we have in place. In particular, we don't require third-party plugin

Re: Is it policy to strip comments from the source code that we commit?

Oh, this explains why I was forced to spend days (elapsed time weeks) understanding the Net-SNMP agent code, which I need to modify in order to implement an audit log feature. AARRRH!! A while ago, I posted to the Net-SNMP users mailing list a question about a guide to the source