On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:20:43 + Dave wrote:
DS It doesn't really seem worth spinning another RC release
DS just for these two changes. How would people feel about
DS me going straight to the final 5.5.1 release?
fine with me.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
On 10 March 2011 20:17, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
You might have missed this patch, reporting a bug in 5.5, 5.6 and trunk:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
The first public RC candidate (rc2) has been out for a week or so now.
I haven't heard any reports of problems with this,
or seen anything logged on the bug/patches tracker)
(Apart from the timezone problem - see
On 10 March 2011 20:17, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
You might have missed this patch, reporting a bug in 5.5, 5.6 and trunk:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=312694aid=3203806group_id=12694.
Correct - I hadn't spotted that.
I'll have a proper look at it in the
The first public RC candidate (rc2) has been out for a week or so now.
I haven't heard any reports of problems with this,
or seen anything logged on the bug/patches tracker)
(Apart from the timezone problem - see the separate CFV)
There's only been one change to the 5.5.x code branch,
being
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:20:43AM +, Dave Shield wrote:
How would people feel about
me going straight to the final 5.5.1 release?
+1
/Niels
--
Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - n...@users.sourceforge.net
The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers --- R W Hamming
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:20:43 +, Dave Shield
d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk said:
DS It doesn't really seem worth spinning another RC release
DS just for these two changes. How would people feel about
DS me going straight to the final 5.5.1 release?
I think that's the right thing to do. It
