On 5/13/19 12:10 PM, Vijay, Anjali wrote:
Thanks for the help. Meanwhile, I had changed the buffer size back to
1472 and it seems to be working fine like the previous version, net-snmp
5.7.3. Do you think this can cause any serious impact?
Hi Anjali,
I think that approach is risky. It's easy
Hi Bart,
Thanks for the help. Meanwhile, I had changed the buffer size back to 1472 and
it seems to be working fine like the previous version, net-snmp 5.7.3. Do you
think this can cause any serious impact?
Regards,
Anjali Vijay
From: Bart Van Assche
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2019 3:39 AM
To:
Thanks Bart !!
Regards,
Anjali S. Vijay
From: Bart Van Assche
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2019 3:38 AM
To: Vijay, Anjali; net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: To understand the increase in size of buffer in agentx_parse() in
net-snmp-5.8
On
On 4/25/19 5:56 PM, Bart Van Assche
wrote:
On 4/25/19 8:00 AM, Vijay, Anjali
wrote:
I recently started working with
net-snmp-5.8. I had a query over a change that was made to
On 4/25/19 8:00 AM, Vijay, Anjali
wrote:
I recently started working with
net-snmp-5.8. I had a query over a change that was made to
agentx_parse() in agent/mibgroup/agentx/protocol.c. I noticed
that the
Hi,
I recently started working with net-snmp-5.8. I had a query over a change that
was made to agentx_parse() in agent/mibgroup/agentx/protocol.c. I noticed that
the buffer of SNMP_MAX_MSG_SIZE (1472) in net-snmp-5.7.3 has been replaced
with the size 65536 in net-snmp-5.8.
u_char
