Re: rpm build question

2009-10-01 Thread Robin Bowes
On 01/10/09 11:11, Dave Shield wrote: > I believe that at when we started, RedHat was still shipping the UCD version. > so the RPM names were different anyway. And of course the RedHat/Fedora > structure and naming conventions are different from the SuSE/Ubuntu ones. > (And there may well be othe

Re: rpm build question

2009-10-01 Thread Dave Shield
2009/10/1 Robin Bowes : >> That's correct - the Net-SNMP binary RPM-based distribution essentially >> bundles all of the core functionality into a single RPM (i.e. net-snmp). >> This covers what some other distributions (e.g. Fedora/RedHat) divide >> between multiple RPMs. >> > > Was there a partic

Re: rpm build question

2009-10-01 Thread Robin Bowes
On 01/10/09 08:37, Dave Shield wrote: > > That's correct - the Net-SNMP binary RPM-based distribution essentially > bundles all of the core functionality into a single RPM (i.e. net-snmp). > This covers what some other distributions (e.g. Fedora/RedHat) divide > between multiple RPMs. > Was ther

Re: rpm build question

2009-10-01 Thread Dave Shield
2009/10/1 Douglas Hussey : > I am using Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5. > I need to rebuild the latest net-snmp-5.5 (rebuild the RPM) . However, after > the rpm build process I only end up with: > net-snmp-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm > net-snmp-debuginfo-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm > net-snmp-devel-5.5-1.x86_

rpm build question

2009-09-30 Thread Douglas Hussey
I am using Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5. I need to rebuild the latest net-snmp-5.5 (rebuild the RPM) . However, after the rpm build process I only end up with: net-snmp-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm net-snmp-debuginfo-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm net-snmp-devel-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm net-snmp-perlmods-5.5-1.x86_64.

5.3.1 rpm build question

2006-08-04 Thread Shane Dawalt
I grabbed the 5.3.1 source and the net-snmp.spec file. I have successfully built the rpm binaries on a RHEL v.3 box. The perl modules were also built successfully, but at the very end of the build process I receive a huge number of messages saying that "installed (but unpackaged)" files we

Re: Build question

2006-04-06 Thread Thomas Anders
Litke, Douglas wrote: How do I get past this? tar -xvf net-snmp-5.3.0.1.tar x net-snmp-5.3.0.1/agent/mibgroup/snmp-notification-mib/snmpNotifyFilterTable/ snmpNotifyFilterTable.h, 19640 bytes, 39 tape blocks tar: directory checksum error [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/net_snmp: I tried adding the "i"

Build question

2006-04-05 Thread Litke, Douglas
How do I get past this? tar -xvf net-snmp-5.3.0.1.tar x net-snmp-5.3.0.1/agent/mibgroup/snmp-notification-mib/snmpNotifyFilterTable/ snmpNotifyFilterTable.h, 19640 bytes, 39 tape blocks tar: directory checksum error [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/net_snmp: I tried adding the "i": option to tar. It igno