Re: Problem with snmp getnext in table

On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:19:56 +0530 Mukherjee, wrote: MA> I could not find the patch attached. Could it be attached - and posted MA> again, please, Oops... here ya go.. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Archive:

RE: Problem with snmp getnext in table

: Re: Problem with snmp getnext in table On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 23:31:17 -0400 Robert wrote: RS> On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:47:07 +0530 Mukherjee, wrote: RS> MA>It worked like magic :) Thanks a ton..., RS> RS> Note that you are just masking the problem, as I'm pretty sure the

Re: Problem with snmp getnext in table

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 23:31:17 -0400 Robert wrote: RS> On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:47:07 +0530 Mukherjee, wrote: RS> MA>It worked like magic :) Thanks a ton..., RS> RS> Note that you are just masking the problem, as I'm pretty sure the code is RS> correct. Well, nobody's perfect. I was focusing

RE: Problem with snmp getnext in table

PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: Problem with snmp getnext in table On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:47:07 +0530 Mukherjee, wrote: MA>It worked like magic :) Thanks a ton..., Note that you are just masking the problem, as I'm pretty sure the code is correct. The actual problem is either in the

Re: Problem with snmp getnext in table

rectly set up. Could you backout this change, and run with '-Dhelper:table,parse_oid_indexes' and send the output to the list? MA> -Original Message- MA> From: Froese Dirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MA> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:01 PM MA> To: '[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: Problem with snmp getnext in table

Dirk, It worked like magic :) Thanks a ton..., Regards, Arijit -Original Message- From: Froese Dirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:01 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: Problem with snmp getnext in table I have had the same problem. O

Re: Problem with snmp getnext in table

I have had the same problem. Only if all indices are specified in the get request you get the correct answer. The problem lies in the function 'netsnmp_table_index_find_next_row' in agent/helpers/table .c: /* * no indexes, or below our minimum column? then use first row. */ if

RE: Problem with snmp getnext in table

jit (Arijit) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problem with snmp getnext in table >I have a table which has got 2 indices and the following is the scenario: > >oid of table: x >oid of tableEntry: x.1 >It has 6 columns (assume names A, B, C, D, E, F) with oid extens

Re: Problem with snmp getnext in table

>I have a table which has got 2 indices and the following is the scenario: > >oid of table: x >oid of tableEntry: x.1 >It has 6 columns (assume names A, B, C, D, E, F) with oid extensions >as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 with A and B as the indices. What type of values are 'A' and 'B'

RE: Problem with snmp getnext in table

All, Also wanted to point out that snmpwalk, however, returns the entries correctly in lexicographic order, Regards, Arijit -Original Message- From: Mukherjee, Arijit (Arijit) Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 9:11 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Problem with snmp getnext in table