On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:35:19 +1000, John Fisher john.fis...@nec.com.au
said:
JF Should the delayed instance example process MODE_GETBULK in the same way as
MODE_GET and MODE_GETNEXT, except with the extra call to
netsnmp_bulk_to_next_fix_requests(requests)?
JF
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:33:16 +1000, John Fisher john.fis...@nec.com.au
said:
JF The first MIB object for which I use the delegated flag is fetched
JF correctly, but then this object is repeated with the message:
After handling the delegated response, set the delegation flag back to 0
and I
Wes Hardaker wrote:
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:33:16 +1000, John Fisher john.fis...@nec.com.au
said:
JF The first MIB object for which I use the delegated flag is fetched
JF correctly, but then this object is repeated with the message:
After handling the delegated response, set the
List members,
I am using the delegated flag in my extension of an snmp agent as
described here:
http://www.net-snmp.org/dev/agent/delayed__instance_8c-example.html
It works well when I test it with snmpwalk, but fails when I use
snmpbulkwalk.
The first MIB object for which I use the delegated
I am using
NET-SNMP version 5.4
configured so:
./configure \
--prefix=${PWD}/net-snmp/install \
--with-perl-modules \
--enable-shared \
--enable-mini-agent \
--with-cc=ppc_82xx-gcc \
--with-ar=ppc_82xx-ar \
--with-linkcc=ppc_82xx-gcc \
--host=powerpc-montavista-linux \
--with-endianness=big \
