On 22 July 2010 16:21, Joan Landry wrote:
> There is a bug in the code where net-snmp is not responding correctly to a
> get-next request where the instance contains a length, followed by a name,
> where the length is > 128.
I presume you are aware that such an OID is not valid?
OIDs are limited
I am trying to debug the net-snmp code and would be very appreciative if
someone can point me to where the function resides that takes an
incoming get-next request and determines the correct instance to respond
with from a lexographically perspective of the incoming request.
There is a bug in t
