On 22 December 2010 05:18, Wes Hardaker harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:47:10 +0100, Joel Hansell
joel.hans...@gmail.com said:
JH Please don't put a table within a table. I'm pretty sure it's not a
JH legal MIB construct, and it would certainly break a lot of
Hi Norman,
Please don't put a table within a table. I'm pretty sure it's not a
legal MIB construct, and it would certainly break a lot of things.
Consider whether you can accomplish the same data association by using
two separate tables, one having one index:
moduleTable
-moduleTableEntry
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:47:10 +0100, Joel Hansell joel.hans...@gmail.com
said:
JH Please don't put a table within a table. I'm pretty sure it's not a
JH legal MIB construct, and it would certainly break a lot of things.
For the record: you're right, it's not legal :-)
--
Wes Hardaker
Cobham
Hallo,
i try to build my first complex mib structure with net-snmp. The mib structure
contains more then one dynamic tables. I use a table
like the bottom table.
static oid moduleTable_oid[] = {1,3,6,1,4,1,26000,25,3,3};
26000.25.3.3 moduleTable (table)
