excellent :D
On 2/10/15 10:33 19PM, James Morris wrote:
>
> on thinking about this for all of two seconds:
> http://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/56031085.jpg
>
>
>
>
>
> On 02/10/15 15:32, ruth catlow wrote:
>> Should Furtherfield sign up to this.
>> - Discuss please!
>> ; )
>> R
>>
>>
>>
On 2015-10-05 02:30, James Morris wrote:
May I suggest looking at meta metrics? Is there such a thing?
Metrics can be aggregated or dimension-reduced.
But you're right: clearly we need metrics for metrics, otherwise how can
we determine which metrics are most performative?
- Rob.
This should go on the Furtherfield mission statement! Brilliantly subversive:
what Craig Saper calls the “intimate bureaucracy.”
On 10/3/15, 5:41 AM, "ruth catlow" wrote:
>a Situationist networked performance
Ha hah!
I posted this link to give everyone a little peak through our window at
the daily stream of 'opportunities' (that feel like veiled threats) that
daily flood the inbox of the UK publicly funded arts org at the moment.
It's connected to the other parallel discussion going on here about
invited by the Arts Council - is it a way for "them" to surveil, to know
who merits money next year?
can Furtherfield say "no"?
embrace extend and ironise
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Rob Myers wrote:
> On 02/10/15 07:32 AM, ruth catlow wrote:
> > Should Furtherfield
don't, unless you have an academic to play around with the results
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:32 PM, ruth catlow
wrote:
> Should Furtherfield sign up to this.
> - Discuss please!
> ; )
> R
>
> Can't see the images? View this email online
>
On 02/Oct/15 10:33, Annie Abrahams wrote:
don't, unless you have an academic to play around with the results
I agree, Annie -- surely this call will be implemented with yet another dot.com
data-harvesting implementation where any/all info is scraped and cashed-in-upon
by those behind the
on thinking about this for all of two seconds:
http://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/56031085.jpg
On 02/10/15 15:32, ruth catlow wrote:
Should Furtherfield sign up to this.
- Discuss please!
; )
R
Can't see the images? View this email online
Fuck off
Sent from my iPad
> On 2 Oct 2015, at 21:33, James Morris wrote:
>
>
> on thinking about this for all of two seconds:
> http://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/56031085.jpg
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 02/10/15 15:32, ruth catlow wrote:
>> Should Furtherfield sign up to this.
>>
On the standardization and metrics:
http://tech-no-mad.net/blog/archives/5867
http://tech-no-mad.net/blog/archives/1343
http://tech-no-mad.net/blog/archives/75193
--
++
Dr. John Hopkins, BSc, MFA, PhD
grounded on a granite batholith
twitter:
Problem?
On 02/10/15 21:39, Adrian Couzens wrote:
Fuck off
Sent from my iPad
On 2 Oct 2015, at 21:33, James Morris wrote:
on thinking about this for all of two seconds:
http://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/56031085.jpg
On 02/10/15 15:32, ruth catlow wrote:
Should
On 02/10/15 07:32 AM, ruth catlow wrote:
> Should Furtherfield sign up to this.
Sounds like a trap. But it might be funny. Metrics are the current
managerialist religion - what we cannot measure we do not know. Embrace,
extend and ironise?
- Rob.
___
12 matches
Mail list logo