Re: [NetBehaviour] pulsating emotion organism.

2008-07-16 Thread dave miller
Hi Pall Well spotted - I didn't see that- so it looks like only pictures, text, video are copyrighted, and not the concept or idea. Why copyright pictures, text, video? dave 2008/7/15 Pall Thayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If the CC license is meant to apply to the work itself, then it's a flawed

Re: [NetBehaviour] pulsating emotion organism.

2008-07-16 Thread bob catchpole
- Original Message From: dave miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 16 July, 2008 9:20:21 AM Why copyright pictures, text, video? Copyright is automatic and universal. If the creator wishes the right can be withdrawn. Bob

[NetBehaviour] Fwd: Fwd: pulsating emotion organism.

2008-07-16 Thread dave miller
-- Forwarded message -- From: Markus Kison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2008/7/16 Subject: Re: Fwd: [NetBehaviour] pulsating emotion organism. To: dave miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is complety correct the CC licencse is meant for the documentation material.

Re: [NetBehaviour] Fwd: pulsating emotion organism.

2008-07-16 Thread dave miller
Hi Markus I understand - you're not copyrighting the idea. It would help if you made this clear on your site, as it gives the impression that your project is your original idea, and this is what you're copyrighting. I think your idea is very similar to mine from a couple of years back, in my

Re: [NetBehaviour] Fwd: pulsating emotion organism.

2008-07-16 Thread bob catchpole
- Original Message From: dave miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 16 July, 2008 6:47:59 PM I think my issue is with copyright and I misunderstood at first thinking Markus was copyrighting the idea. Dave, you seem to misunderstand the nature of copyright. Ideas cannot be