Re: [NetBehaviour] exist.pl and communication, what next?

2008-08-06 Thread Pall Thayer
So finally Rob and Clement. Here's a response. Affero? Never heard of it and I don't really get what they're about from their website. I'll think about it. I just finished writing a lengthy response to Curt Cloninger on Rhizome regarding the philosophical side of the exist.pl project. Curt knows

Re: [NetBehaviour] exist.pl and communication, what next?

2008-08-01 Thread Rob Myers
Pall Thayer wrote: > For > now here's the updated source code with the communications socket that > outputs the programs code when something is sent. Oh cool. The Affero GPL requires just this behaviour as part of programs covered by it, so it might be conceptually interesting to licence this ve

Re: [NetBehaviour] exist.pl and communication, what next?

2008-08-01 Thread Pall Thayer
Hi Clement, Just want to respond to show that I am paying attention. I've been pretty busy with a number of things so I haven't had time to respond to yours and Robs very interesting points. And now I'm going out of town over the weekend. I will try to respond after the weekend. For now here's the

Re: [NetBehaviour] exist.pl and communication, what next?

2008-07-30 Thread clemos
Hi Pall I'm glad I helped. I really love your project, because such things have been very often in my thoughts and a few times in my text editor. I've been thinking about similar experiments very much, but (as often with me) these reflexions have quickly turned into too complex things, so that mos

Re: [NetBehaviour] exist.pl and communication, what next?

2008-07-30 Thread Rob Myers
The program could be made self-modifying so it changes from generation to generation (I think I mentioned this before but I do like the idea ;-) ): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymorphic_code It could have a simple emotional system, like the one from The Sims (this code is public so I don't thi

Re: [NetBehaviour] exist.pl and communication, what next?

2008-07-30 Thread Pall Thayer
clemos wrote: > Hi Pall > > It would be logical to me that your program respond its own source code. > It can be seen as a way to express itself, and probably be > misunderstood, but also to survive by duplicating itself. > That's a good point. I like it and I've now incorporated it but haven't

Re: [NetBehaviour] exist.pl and communication, what next?

2008-07-29 Thread clemos
Hi Pall It would be logical to me that your program respond its own source code. It can be seen as a way to express itself, and probably be misunderstood, but also to survive by duplicating itself. Actually, I still don't really get why it just "recreates" itself in the end as a way to survive, be

[NetBehaviour] exist.pl and communication, what next?

2008-07-28 Thread Pall Thayer
(ps. I'm now posting these to both Rhizome and Netbehaviour. My apologies to anyone who receives them twice.) The latest revision to exist.pl has opened a whole new can of beans. Since it is now capable of receiving communication from other processes it will inevitably have to respond and that's t