Curt, my response would be for net artists to build their own guggenheims
of monumentality that can only be served by the network. I don¹t think the
networked aspirations begun in the 1990s have yet to be completed!
On 5/14/15, 12:27 AM, c...@lab404.com c...@lab404.com wrote:
Thanks Randall,
I
Hi Randall
That's a really nice idea - museums dedicated to net art. Closest we get to
this is websites and blogs featuring work I suppose. Or virtual galleries
as in second life.
Wonder how such a thing would look/ what form it would take?
On 19 May 2015 at 15:46, Randall Packer
For me, the net itself (when solely the net) feels better for idiosyncratic
wunderkammer than monumental institutions. (My own is here:
http://deepyoung.org )
Regarding shows in physical galleries, there is the story of the little girl
who can't sleep because she's scared. Her mom comforts
Hi Curt, I love your playdamage works. Keep them coming, do one a day, no
damage control here!
All best,
Randall
On 5/13/15, 12:34 PM, c...@lab404.com c...@lab404.com wrote:
http://playdamage.org/109.html
http://playdamage.org/108.html
love,
curt
Thanks Randall,
I have a (pipe) dream that before I die I will get a playdamage show at the
guggenheim, with 100+ monitors and directional speakers going all the way up,
one for each playdamage.
During the show in the atrium I will do an on-site residency for a month where
I am there all day
http://playdamage.org/109.html
http://playdamage.org/108.html
love,
curt
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
http://playdamage.org/103.html
{the ballad of Tulse_Luper}
vs.
http://playdamage.org/102.html
{the ballad of Gang_Lion}
//
source watercolors by peter greenaway
source audio by superchunk
___
NetBehaviour
