On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 22:00:33 +0530
Mayuresh wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:14:52AM -0600, Greg Oster wrote:
> > Does your machine have the optional AMD graphics? That is, are
> > there two different graphics chipsets in the machine?
>
> dmesg shows this, Radeon I
MI port (and USB-C) on the back only works with NVIDIA,
and the Mini Display Port on the side only works with Intel :( )
Later...
Greg Oster
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:40:31 +0200
Riccardo Mottola <riccardo.mott...@libero.it> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Greg Oster wrote:
> > This patch is similar to one Thomas sent me... The trick to making
> > them both work is to nuke the x11-links package (Thanks Macallan!)
> >
pid 1766.1 lowest
kstack 0xfe806abec2c0
dumping to dev 18,1 (offset=18259895, size=2092553):
but I havn't investigated as to what's up yet (it crashed Oct 13,
and then Nov 7 and Nov 8... )
Later...
Greg Oster
width is perfect. The number
of data components is good.
b) get the filesystem 4K-aligned
c) use a 64K block size for the filesystem
d) Use 'bs=64k' (or 'bs=10m') to see better IO performance
4) As others have said, if you need high-performance writes, RAID 5 is
probably not what you want, especially if you're not streaming writes
in 64K chunks.
Later...
Greg Oster
of=/home/testfile bs=10240k count=32768
so that at least you're sending 64K chunks to the disk... After that,
64K blocks on the filesystem are going to be next, and that might be
more effort than it's worth, depending on the results of the above
dd's...
Later...
Greg Oster
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 01:08:21 +0700
Robert Elz <k...@munnari.oz.au> wrote:
> Date:Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:52:30 -0600
> From: Greg Oster <os...@netbsd.org>
> Message-ID: <20151125105230.209c5...@mickey.usask.ca>
>
> | Just to recap: Y
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:38:38 +0200
Frank Wille <fr...@phoenix.owl.de> wrote:
> Greg Oster wrote:
>
> >> And wouldn't it be nice to fix RAIDframe, so that a
> >> previous /dev/raid1 is automatically configured as /dev/raid0
> >> again, when raid0 d
e that it'd be nice to have an IOCTL for raidctl to change which
device a RAID set will show up as on next reboot... It's not that hard
to do -- just requires time to do a little coding.
Later...
Greg Oster
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:02:44 +0100
Fredrik Pettai pet...@nordu.net wrote:
On 17 Feb 2015, at 18:13 , Greg Oster os...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:40:03 +0100
BERTRAND Joël joel.bertr...@systella.fr wrote:
Hello,
I've seen that sys/dev/raidframe contains some code
the results though!)
Later...
Greg Oster
be needed...
Later...
Greg Oster
it shouldn't just 'fix' itself like that. I'd do a
'rebuild-in-place' ('raidctl -R') on whatever component was last to
join... otherwise you run the risk of at some point reading in corrupt
data...
Later...
Greg Oster
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 21:24:06 +
Dave Tyson dty...@anduin.org.uk wrote:
On 12/19/14 15:10, Greg Oster wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:03:48 +
Dave Tyson dty...@anduin.org.uk wrote:
On 12/19/14 00:49, Greg Troxel wrote:
Does dmesg show any disk errors? Can you dd from the disk
?
Or would you get problems like I just did?
Probably :(
Later...
Greg Oster
Because the RAID 1 set whose reconstruction causes a system hang was
created with three components.
Below is the original email I was going to send describing the problem
in a bit more detail, in the case
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 23:30:06 +0200
Jarmo Jaakkola netbsd-us...@roskakori.fi wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:04:09PM -0600, Greg Oster wrote:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:37:53 +0200
Jarmo Jaakkola netbsd-us...@roskakori.fi wrote:
Is [RAIDframe only supporting two mirrored components] still
the difference...
Cheers,
Patrick
Later...
Greg Oster
older, former cold backup disk and added the new disk (after
unconfiguring the old one). Will raid2 still be raid2 after rebooting,
or will it take the vacant name raid0?
raid2 will stay at raid2. See 'last_unit' in
/usr/include/dev/raidframe/raidframevar.h
Later...
Greg Oster
to get some data from it...)
Thanks in advance,
Good luck!
Later...
Greg Oster
19 matches
Mail list logo
