On ott 29 10:16, Michael van Elst wrote:
> The "port forwarding case" only handles single ports. You need
> separate map commands for each port.
After several errors, I was wondering in fact if this was the reason.
Thanks for clarifying this!
Rocky
rockyho...@firemail.cc (Rocky Hotas) writes:
>In particular, for example,
>map $myif dynamic proto tcp $myhost port 33434-33435 <- $myif port 55000-55001
>doesn't work:
># npfctl reload
>/etc/npf.conf:41:92: port range is not valid near '55001'
The "port forwarding case" only handles single
On ott 28 12:22, Martin Husemann wrote:
> There is an example in /usr/share/examples/npf/host-npf.conf:
>
> # Allow being tracerouted
> pass in proto udp to any port 33434-33600
This is a single use (but thanks! I forgot this example file). My case
is double, because I would like to map
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:16:36PM +0100, Rocky Hotas wrote:
> 1) How to represent port ranges? I tried with
>
> beginning_port:end_port (which for example is used in OpenBSD's pf)
> beginning_port,end_port
> beginning_port-end_port
>
> $port_range = { beginning_port, end_port }
>
> but none of
Hello!
After browsing the available documentation for npf, I did not find any
hints about some issues.
1) How to represent port ranges? I tried with
beginning_port:end_port (which for example is used in OpenBSD's pf)
beginning_port,end_port
beginning_port-end_port
$port_range = {
On 3/17/15 6:34 PM, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
Hi, Mindaugas.
First, let me say thank you for your excellent work on NPF!
D'Arcy J.M. Cain da...@netbsd.org wrote:
I have decided to give up on pf after banging my head against
the wall (and the OBSD mailing list) and try npf but I
can't
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 20:37:16 +0100
rudolf net...@eq.cz wrote:
Are you using an older version of NPF? This seems like 3) in this
email from two years ago:
https://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2013/04/13/msg012733.html
I am running NetBSD 6.1.5_PATCH. I guess that
D'Arcy J.M. Cain da...@netbsd.org wrote:
I have decided to give up on pf after banging my head against the wall
(and the OBSD mailing list) and try npf but I can't figure out the
syntax. I followed the example at http://www.netbsd.org/~rmind/npf/
but I keep getting errors when I validate. I
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 20:37:16 +0100
rudolf net...@eq.cz wrote:
Are you using an older version of NPF? This seems like 3) in this
email from two years ago:
https://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2013/04/13/msg012733.html
I am running NetBSD 6.1.5_PATCH. I guess that doesn't have the most
I have decided to give up on pf after banging my head against the wall
(and the OBSD mailing list) and try npf but I can't figure out the
syntax. I followed the example at http://www.netbsd.org/~rmind/npf/
but I keep getting errors when I validate. I reduced npf.conf to the
following two lines:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:52 AM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain da...@netbsd.org wrote:
I have decided to give up on pf after banging my head against the wall
(and the OBSD mailing list) and try npf but I can't figure out the
syntax. I followed the example at http://www.netbsd.org/~rmind/npf/
but I keep
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
[...]
table friends type tree file /VEX/general/pf/friends.list
table enemies type tree file /VEX/general/pf/enemies.list
This gives me this error:
# npfctl validate
npfctl: table '0' is already defined
If I remove one line I get this:
# npfctl validate
table 0 type
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:26:58 GMT
Gerard Lally lists+netbsd.us...@netmail.ie wrote:
At date and time Mon, 16 Mar 2015 09:52:07 -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain
wrote:
# npfctl validate
/etc/npf.conf:11:3: syntax error near 'alg'
I am using the example config almost verbatim except for the table
13 matches
Mail list logo
