On 2017-07-22 18:35, g...@duzan.org wrote:
I wrote:
=> "Johnny Billquist" wrote:
=> => On 2017-07-22 16:38, dieter roelants wrote:
=> =>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:33:36 +0200
=> =>> Johnny Billquist wrote:
=> =>>
=> =>>> No. You should not set an ip address
"Johnny Billquist" wrote:
=> On 2017-07-22 16:38, dieter roelants wrote:
=>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:33:36 +0200
=>> Johnny Billquist wrote:
=>>
=>>> No. You should not set an ip address on any of the interfaces. You
=>>> create a bridge interface, connect
On 2017-07-22 16:38, dieter roelants wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:33:36 +0200
Johnny Billquist wrote:
No. You should not set an ip address on any of the interfaces. You
create a bridge interface, connect all the physical interfaces to the
bridge interface, and you set an
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:33:36 +0200
Johnny Billquist wrote:
> No. You should not set an ip address on any of the interfaces. You
> create a bridge interface, connect all the physical interfaces to the
> bridge interface, and you set an ip address on the bridge interface.
one LAN IP address(I run an app on the
alias interface.).
Derrick Lobo
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Billquist [mailto:b...@update.uu.se]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 4:44 PM
To: Brook Milligan; Derrick Lobo
Cc: Francisco Valladolid H.; netbsd-users@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: creatin
k Milligan; Derrick Lobo
Cc: Francisco Valladolid H.; netbsd-users@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: creating a netbsd router
On 2017-07-19 20:01, Brook Milligan wrote:
>
>> On Jul 19, 2017, at 10:01 AM, Derrick Lobo <derrick.l...@givex.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> So does th
On 2017-07-19 20:01, Brook Milligan wrote:
On Jul 19, 2017, at 10:01 AM, Derrick Lobo wrote:
So does that means each of the interface has an ip eg 192.168.0.1 on wm1
192.168.0.2 on wm2 and so on and then just bridge all the interface. Ill try
that . for now only wm1
ts and all worked with no issues.
Derrick
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Billquist [mailto:b...@update.uu.se]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 4:34 PM
To: Derrick Lobo; Francisco Valladolid H.; netbsd-users@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: creating a netbsd router
On 2017-07-19 18:01, Derrick
...@update.uu.se]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 11:53 AM
To: Derrick Lobo; Francisco Valladolid H.; netbsd-users@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: creating a netbsd router
I seriously doubt agr is what you wanted anyway.
It's for if you want to have multiple parallell connections between two
devices in order
ck Lobo
Cc: Johnny Billquist; Francisco Valladolid H.; netbsd-users@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: creating a netbsd router
> On Jul 19, 2017, at 10:01 AM, Derrick Lobo <derrick.l...@givex.com> wrote:
>
> So does that means each of the interface has an ip eg 192.168.0.1 on
> wm1
Billquist [mailto:b...@update.uu.se]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 11:53 AM
To: Derrick Lobo; Francisco Valladolid H.; netbsd-users@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: creating a netbsd router
I seriously doubt agr is what you wanted anyway.
It's for if you want to have multiple parallell connections between
will
investigate this further.
Thanks again everyone
Derrick
*From:*Francisco Valladolid H. [mailto:fic...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, July 16, 2017 6:41 AM
*To:* Derrick Lobo; netbsd-users@netbsd.org
*Subject:* Re: creating a netbsd router
Hi folks
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 4:06 AM Derrick
not get it to work will investigate
this further.
Thanks again everyone
Derrick
From: Francisco Valladolid H. [mailto:fic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 6:41 AM
To: Derrick Lobo; netbsd-users@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: creating a netbsd router
Hi folks
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 4
Hi folks
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 4:06 AM Derrick Lobo wrote:
> I have a device with 8 network interface,so wondering if I can set this
> up as my router/switch
>
Ok
I would like to create eth0 as the WAN interface and the remaining eth1-6
> as the LAN interface so that
Yes, it's possible. I did it with a raspberry pi for a short time.
As others have stated, bonding and bridging are 2 separate things...
Hopefully you know which one you want. Bridge is like creating a
switch out of some ports (like the LAN ports of a home router),
bonding (agr) is for attaching
On 2017-07-15 12:53, co...@sdf.org wrote:
I don't know my way around networking, but I suspect agr(4) is the equivalent.
Uh. I'm not sure.
If I wanted to create some switch-line thingy, I would use the bridge
interface...
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:53:58PM -0400, Derrick Lobo wrote:
> I would like to create eth0 as the WAN interface and the remaining eth1-6
> as the LAN interface so that I can connect multiple switches and devices
> directly on the 7 remaining ports..
As others have said: if you want multiple of
On 15/07/2017 11:33, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=lagg=0=0=FreeBSD+11.0-RELEASE+and+Ports=default=html
is the same thing..
No lagg (4) under
http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi/apropos?lagg++NetBSD-current
Name is different again on NetNSD you are
I don't know my way around networking, but I suspect agr(4) is the equivalent.
> I have a device with 8 network interface,so wondering if I can set this up
> as my router/switch
>
> I would like to create eth0 as the WAN interface and the remaining eth1-6
> as the LAN interface so that I can connect multiple switches and devices
> directly on the 7 remaining ports.. is
I have a device with 8 network interface,so wondering if I can set this up
as my router/switch
I would like to create eth0 as the WAN interface and the remaining eth1-6
as the LAN interface so that I can connect multiple switches and devices
directly on the 7 remaining ports.. is vlan, bridging
21 matches
Mail list logo