On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 at 11:53, Rhialto wrote:
>
> I have various files around with carriage control. You get them from
> emulators/hercules, for instance. So at the very least they should be
> packaged.
IIRC OpenBSD refactored the code a long time back to make one of them
provide both
I have various files around with carriage control. You get them from
emulators/hercules, for instance. So at the very least they should be packaged.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 . Please excuse my brevity.
On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:31:48 +
co...@sdf.org wrote:
> POSIX at least seems to say,
>
> Issue 6
>
> This utility is marked as part of the FORTRAN Runtime Utilities option.
>
> So perhaps that counts as optional now.
Quoting from Issue 7, in regard to all things so marked:
[FR] [Option
On Jan 5, 5:10pm, Christos Zoulas wrote:
} In article <20190105120103.ga21...@sdf.org>, wrote:
} >
} >these programs are relics intended for running old fortran on old
} >machines.
} >fortran carriage-control is no longer a thing as of fortran 2008.
} >netbsd no longer ships other fortran
Last time I proposed this, I was told asa (at least) was mandated by POSIX
On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 at 04:01, wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> these programs are relics intended for running old fortran on old
> machines.
> fortran carriage-control is no longer a thing as of fortran 2008.
> netbsd no longer
POSIX at least seems to say,
Issue 6
This utility is marked as part of the FORTRAN Runtime Utilities option.
So perhaps that counts as optional now.
In article <20190105120103.ga21...@sdf.org>, wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>these programs are relics intended for running old fortran on old
>machines.
>fortran carriage-control is no longer a thing as of fortran 2008.
>netbsd no longer ships other fortran components.
>
>I'd like to remove them both.
Hi folks,
these programs are relics intended for running old fortran on old
machines.
fortran carriage-control is no longer a thing as of fortran 2008.
netbsd no longer ships other fortran components.
I'd like to remove them both.
Certainly fpr does not make sense as asa is the more standard
