On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 08:19:04AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 07:40:52AM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
i have heard good things about pcc, mostly, except for perhaps the
fact that it doesn't yet support all the netbsd platforms which
gcc does.
And it has no C++
from Mayuresh Kathe:
i just read a note somewhere on the web about netbsd folks trying
out an alternative compiler set (pcc).
did that not work out?
i have heard good things about pcc, mostly, except for perhaps the
fact that it doesn't yet support all the netbsd platforms which
On Jun 17, 2014, at 7:10 PM, Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@kathe.in wrote:
hello,
i just read a note somewhere on the web about netbsd folks trying
out an alternative compiler set (pcc).
did that not work out?
Actually, NetBSD has 3 possible compilers: gcc, clang/llvm, and pcc.
Each compiler
hello,
while i was drawn to netbsd because of the upcoming lua
support in the kernel and userland, i am quite lost about
the probable use cases for real-world scenarios.
prima-face, it feels quite strange to have a scriptable
kernel and have that capability extended through out the
userland.
i
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@kathe.in wrote:
hello,
while i was drawn to netbsd because of the upcoming lua
support in the kernel and userland, i am quite lost about
the probable use cases for real-world scenarios.
prima-face, it feels quite strange to have a
Rocky Hotas rockyho...@post.com writes:
I am quite new with this mailing-list.
I've redirected followups to netbsd-users. tech-userlevel is for
arguing about complicated bugs or proposed changes ;-)
During the installation of NetBSD, I choose /bin/sh as the default root and
user shell.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Rocky Hotas rockyho...@post.com writes:
I am quite new with this mailing-list.
I've redirected followups to netbsd-users. tech-userlevel is for
arguing about complicated bugs or proposed changes ;-)
During the
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 at 3:09 PM
From: matthew sporleder msporle...@gmail.com
To: Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com
Cc: Rocky Hotas rockyho...@post.com, NetBSD Users Mailing List
netbsd-users@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: Create a file with history in sh
ksh will have all of the features
Not sure who maintains the links on the site, but someone on freenode
graciously gave me this link.
I couldn't find it in the documentation or wiki so I implore you that it be
added.
Thank you.
NPF documentation
NPF documentation
Official NPF documentation
View on netbsd.org Preview by
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Rocky Hotas rockyho...@post.com wrote:
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 at 2:51 PM
From: Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com
To: Rocky Hotas rockyho...@post.com
Cc: netbsd-users@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: Create a file with history in sh
I've redirected followups to
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:32:01PM +0200, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
On 17 June 2014 20:59, g.lister g.lis...@nodeunit.com wrote:
Hi Mayuresh,
snip
Can I be grumpy for a second?
What happened to bottom posting? Has it gone out of fashion?
Interleaved is better! Oh! and trim out any
Justin Cormack jus...@specialbusservice.com writes:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Rocky Hotas rockyho...@post.com wrote:
- do you suggest to seldom use the root account in order to prevent some
system damages, like in the other *nix systems, or for other reasons?
Yes, it is just the
On 18 June 2014 15:09, matthew sporleder msporle...@gmail.com wrote:
ksh will have all of the features you want and is installed in base.
Interesting. I definitely need bash as a normal user but I would
gladly use ksh as root.
Why is this not in the docs and in INSTALL.html? That would have
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Ottavio Caruso
ottavio2006-usenet2...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 18 June 2014 15:09, matthew sporleder msporle...@gmail.com wrote:
ksh will have all of the features you want and is installed in base.
Interesting. I definitely need bash as a normal user but I would
On 06/17/2014 11:32 PM, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
On 6/17/14, 4:02 PM, g.lister wrote:
The next rule there is
+++
pass out final all
+++
I think it should be evaluated as it is after the blocking of TCP
transactions so UDP should be going out, but following your comment I
played around with
On 06/18/2014 03:22 PM, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:32:01PM +0200, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
On 17 June 2014 20:59, g.lister g.lis...@nodeunit.com wrote:
Hi Mayuresh,
snip
Can I be grumpy for a second?
What happened to bottom posting? Has it gone out of fashion?
At date and time Wed, 18 Jun 2014 07:39:59 +0300, Terho Uotila wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:06:12 +0100
Gerard Lally wrote:
guide. Indeed I am still not 100% clear about it. It's also difficult
to get mk.conf working so that GNU and Perl and Sourceforge software
is pulled from a local
17 matches
Mail list logo
