Re: pkgin does not install anything after upgrade to 9.2

Hi Greg, Thanks for the suggestion. I'm still doing the backup but will come back with the outcome. Best regards, r0ller Eredeti levél Feladó: Greg Troxel < g...@lexort.com (Link -> mailto:g...@lexort.com) > Dátum: 2021 július 9 13:06:24 Tárgy: Re: pkgin does no

Re: pkgin does not install anything after upgrade to 9.2

Boot to single user and full fsck. Also make the backups you have been meaning to get around to right away

Re: pkgin does not install anything after upgrade to 9.2

Hi Greg, Thanks for your suggestions! It indeed seems to be corrupted :( I tried to nuke (rm -rf) the directory /usr/pkg/pkgdb/p5-Net-SSLeay-1.88nb1 but I got back that the directory is not empty which is pretty unusual for rm -rf. Now, when I try to list its contents, three files are

Re: pkgin does not install anything after upgrade to 9.2

r0ller writes: > The only error I see in pkg_install-err.log (which is not shown as > error) which seems to block each pkg install is: > > pkg_admin: Cannot read +CONTENTS of package p5-Net-SSLeay-1.88nb1 > > Does anyone have any hint? pkg_admin rebuild-tree pkg_admin check make sure your

Re: pkgin does not install anything after upgrade to 9.2

On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 04:14:08PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 02:36:17PM +0200, r0ller wrote: > > is quite noticeable when starting firefox. However, after changing > > repositories.conf to point to amd64/9.2/All and upgrading all packages, > > nothing seems to have

Re: pkgin does not install anything after upgrade to 9.2

On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 02:36:17PM +0200, r0ller wrote: > is quite noticeable when starting firefox. However, after changing > repositories.conf to point to amd64/9.2/All and upgrading all packages, > nothing seems to have been upgraded and pkgin does not seem to install > anything. The

Re: pkgin repo

On Wed, 7 Apr 2021, Dan Cîrnaț wrote: Telling pkgin: 'pkgin install gdm' led to 59 packages being "refreshed", and 4 more installed. Please be aware that those pkgin repos only have packages for the main pkgsrc tree, excluding pkgsrc-wip. The gdm version there is 2.x., an old one. I did

Re: pkgin repo

On 06/04/2021 22:54, Bob Bernstein wrote: I am taking a first run at pkgin. It fails trying to get a file from: https://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/$arch/9.99.81/All ...which can be found in my /usr/pkg/etc/pkgin/repositories.conf. I have here:  $ uname -a NetBSD nebbytwo

Re: pkgin repo

On 07.04.21 03:44, Bob Bernstein wrote: Telling pkgin: 'pkgin install gdm' led to 59 packages being "refreshed", and 4 more installed. Please be aware that those pkgin repos only have packages for the main pkgsrc tree, excluding pkgsrc-wip. The gdm version there is 2.x., an old one. Dan

Re: pkgin repo

On Wed, 7 Apr 2021, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: I don't think there are "official" pkgin repos for -current. However, check https://pkgsrc.joyent.com/install-on-netbsd/ . What I put in my /usr/pkg/etc/pkgin/reposiories.conf was: https://pkgsrc.joyent.com/packages/NetBSD/trunk/x86_64/All/ Telling

Re: pkgin repo

On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 at 22:54, Bob Bernstein wrote: > > I am taking a first run at pkgin. It fails trying to get a file > from: > > https://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/$arch/9.99.81/All > > ...which can be found in my > /usr/pkg/etc/pkgin/repositories.conf. > > I have here: > $

Re: pkgin refresh vs. upgrade?

Mike, I neglected to thank you for this answer! Thanks, that actually makes sense. Cheers, /Liman On 17/06/2020 07:39, Lars-Johan Liman wrote: >> Hi! mpumf...@mudcovered.org.uk 2020-06-17 09:37 [+0100]: > This is all based on

Re: pkgin refresh vs. upgrade?

On 17/06/2020 07:39, Lars-Johan Liman wrote: Hi! This is all based on observation rather than documentation. When running pkgin to upgrade one or more packages, it often says "X packages to refresh, Y packages to upgrade". Refresh means the version hasn't changed but the package has been

Re: pkgin error (possible workaround)

Thanks for the report. On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:38 PM Greg Troxel wrote: > > Lars-Johan Liman writes: > > > I've found that the x86_64 and amd64 directories seem to be out of sync > > on cdn.netbsd.org. In short, pkg_summary seems to be updated in x86_64 > > but not in amd64. For me the

Re: pkgin error (possible workaround)

Lars-Johan Liman writes: > I've found that the x86_64 and amd64 directories seem to be out of sync > on cdn.netbsd.org. In short, pkg_summary seems to be updated in x86_64 > but not in amd64. For me the following simple workaround worked: Thanks for the specific report. > I modified the

Re: pkgin error (possible workaround)

Hi Dima (all)! I've found that the x86_64 and amd64 directories seem to be out of sync on cdn.netbsd.org. In short, pkg_summary seems to be updated in x86_64 but not in amd64. For me the following simple workaround worked: I modified the repository pointer in

Re: pkgin error

Hi Matthew, MN> http://cdn.Netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/amd64/... MN> http://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/amd64/... MN> yielded different data. Both hostnames resolved to the same IP addresses MS> I fixed the host header thing when that was pointed out.

Re: pkgin error

On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 8:42 AM Martin Neitzel wrote: > > ill> Same here. > ill> > ill> $ echo "select file_size from remote_pkg where pkgname like > ill> 'xmlcatmgr%'" | sqlite3 pkgin.db > ill> 25004 > ill> > ill> $ ftp > ill> >

Re: pkgin error

ill> Same here. ill> ill> $ echo "select file_size from remote_pkg where pkgname like ill> 'xmlcatmgr%'" | sqlite3 pkgin.db ill> 25004 ill> ill> $ ftp ill> https://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/amd64/8.0/All/xmlcatmgr-2.2nb1.tgz ill> 24864 bytes retrieved in 00:00 (16.63 MiB/s) Some

Re: pkgin error

On 15.05.2020 17:22, nottobay wrote: I keep getting a bunch of errors saying "download error size does not match pkg_summary" I try just telling it to proceed but the package still doesn't install. I have already tried forcing a pgkin update and it didn't fix it, and I'm using the default repo

Re: pkgin error

I had same problems and I've found that CDN directory contents may be not in sync with pkg_summary. I tried to work it out (thinking there might be one server not in sync) but had short time and no success so that time I just switched to legacy source. How cdn is organized in short? It would be

Re: pkgin error

It is saying no such file or directory for /var/db/cache but /var/db/ at 454982 out of 38176044 so space isn't the problem, On Fri, May 15, 2020, 11:38 wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:22:59AM -0400, nottobay wrote: > >I keep getting a bunch of errors saying "download error >

Re: pkgin error

Hello, On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:22:59AM -0400, nottobay wrote: >I keep getting a bunch of errors saying "download error >size does not match pkg_summary" I try just telling it to proceed but the >package still doesn't install. I have already tried forcing a pgkin update >and it

Re: pkgin

Thx! Yes, that's understandable. Still, https://gitlab.com/iMil/pkgin looks to be outdated as well :( The best would be if http://pkgin.net/ pointed to https://github.com/joyent/pkgin which seems to be the master branch. Den fre 19 okt. 2018 15:45matthew sporleder skrev: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018

Re: pkgin

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 3:24 AM Pedro Pinho wrote: > > Hi all, > I'm rather new to NetBSD, been using it on a laptop for about 3 months now, > amd64 8.0. I'm really enjoying this OS and everything is working fine. So, > sorry if this has already been answered... > > Why does http://pkgin.net/

Re: pkgin repo change

Thanks! Just waiting for the mirrors to sync, then I'll change back my repositories.conf :) Den ons 19 sep. 2018 06:21 skrev: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 08:59:55PM -0400, Eric Hawicz wrote: > > On 9/18/2018 4:37 AM, Pedro Pinho wrote: > > > This morning trying to update/upgrade my system I got

Re: pkgin repo change

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 08:59:55PM -0400, Eric Hawicz wrote: > On 9/18/2018 4:37 AM, Pedro Pinho wrote: > > This morning trying to update/upgrade my system I got the following, > > |~$ sudo pkgin update Password: processing remote summary > >

Re: pkgin repo change

On 9/18/2018 4:37 AM, Pedro Pinho wrote: This morning trying to update/upgrade my system I got the following, |~$ sudo pkgin update Password: processing remote summary (http://ftp.fr.NetBSD.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/amd64/8.0 pkgin: Could not fetch

Re: pkgin with NetBSD 8.0_BETA

George Georgalis writes: > Thanks for the breakout, trying to work out the best way to smooth the > ride. Indeed, I had a kernel derived 8.0 ${PKG_PATH}/pkgin and a > personal pkgin configuration script hard coded the (7.0.2) repository, > artifacts trying to reliably derive

Re: pkgin with NetBSD 8.0_BETA

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: > > George Georgalis writes: > >> Not sure if I'm doing something wrong or if this relates to _BETA. > > I would not be surpised by some rough edges around 8.0 pre-release. Thanks for the breakout, trying to

Re: pkgin with NetBSD 8.0_BETA

George Georgalis writes: > Not sure if I'm doing something wrong or if this relates to _BETA. I would not be surpised by some rough edges around 8.0 pre-release. > After a minimal (GENERIC.201708260340Z) amd64 install, > > # URLROOT="http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/; > #

Re: pkgin: how to remove all package

Hello, Thank you for the link. The examples in it use pkg_delete, though. Are there plans to extend pkgin remove with similar functionality? Regards rambius On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Jay Patel wrote: > I think this should do the trick >

Re: pkgin: how to remove all package

I think this should do the trick https://wiki.netbsd.org/pkgsrc/how_to_upgrade_packages/#index8h2 On 26-Jul-2017 6:55 PM, "Ivan "Rambius" Ivanov" < rambiusparkisan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > How can I remove all installed packages using pkgin? > > Regards > rambius > > -- > Tangra Mega

Re: pkgin giving "download mismatch"

On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 12:37:40 -0400 "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" wrote: > The actual size of the file is 414007 bytes. The file size shown in > the summary file is 1528317. This is the output of "pkg_info -Xa" as > suggested by the guide. So where does it get 70120480? That number > is

Re: pkgin giving "download mismatch"

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:57:27 -0400 "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" wrote: > downloading packages... > p5-Mozilla-CA-20150826.tgz 100% 155KB 155.0KB/s 155.0KB/s 00:00 > pkgin: download > mismatch: /var/db/pkgin/cache/p5-Mozilla-CA-20150826.tgz Anyone have any clue here yet? I just upgraded

Re: pkgin giving "download mismatch"

On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 11:29:53 -0400 "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" wrote: > Anyone have any clue here yet? I just upgraded my pkgin to the latest > version (pkg_delete/pkg_add still works) and still have the same > problem. I think I have found the problem. I added a bit of debug code to

Re: pkgin giving download mismatch

On 27 August 2015 at 13:57, D'Arcy J.M. Cain da...@netbsd.org wrote: Then I went to the repository server and did rm -rf /usr/pkgsrc/packages/* /var/db/pkg* /usr/pkg/* and rebuilt everything from scratch and still have the issue. Is this your own repository server or a NetBSD mirror? --

Re: pkgin giving download mismatch

Maybe on download server side the pkg_summary(5) available database doesn't match the actual download package.

Re: pkgin giving download mismatch

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:54:14 +0100 Ottavio Caruso ottavio2006-net...@yahoo.com wrote: On 27 August 2015 at 13:57, D'Arcy J.M. Cain da...@netbsd.org wrote: Then I went to the repository server and did rm -rf /usr/pkgsrc/packages/* /var/db/pkg* /usr/pkg/* and rebuilt everything from scratch

Re: pkgin giving download mismatch

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:51:00 -0500 (CDT) Jeremy C. Reed r...@reedmedia.net wrote: Maybe on download server side the pkg_summary(5) available database doesn't match the actual download package. As I said, I wiped out everything on both sides and started over. Everything is freshly built. --

Re: pkgin giving download mismatch

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:11:24 +0100 Ottavio Caruso ottavio2006-net...@yahoo.com wrote: What's in your repositories.conf? The system default. I haven't touched it. Instead I have set PKG_REPOS in my environment to point to my repository. Side issue - I also set PKG_PATH to the same thing for

Re: pkgin fails to install in the install kernel

It was using more than 640M of VM? While I agree not having a failure reported as success would be the top priority, the thought that it was using that much VM during install is... scary. What arch is this on? i386 has a set_swap() in sysinst to use swapspace if less than 32M of ram, but amd64

Re: pkgin fails to install in the install kernel

On 16 November 2014 13:50, Andy Ruhl acr...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 5:49 AM, David Brownlee a...@absd.org wrote: It was using more than 640M of VM? While I agree not having a failure reported as success would be the top priority, the thought that it was using that much VM

Re: Pkgin Binaries

Hi. NetBSD binary packages for 6.1.5 don't exist, you can use ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/amd64/6.0_2014Q3/All 6.1.5 directory is symlink to 6.0 Regards On Nov 11, 2014 5:44 PM, Will Dignazio wdigna...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure if this was intentional, but it appears

Re: Pkgin Binaries

Hello, Strange, is that symlink intermittent? I had used the 6.1.5 url previously without any problems. Thanks! -- Will On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Francisco Valladolid H. fic...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. NetBSD binary packages for 6.1.5 don't exist, you can use

Re: Pkgin Binaries

Ah, never mind, I see what happened. I didn't realize the quarter had changed. Although, I find it odd that the new symlink is set before the directory is populated with built packages. -- Will On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Will Dignazio wdigna...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Strange, is that

Re: Pkgin Binaries

Will Dignazio wdigna...@gmail.com writes: Strange, is that symlink intermittent? I had used the 6.1.5 url previously without any problems. I really doubt it's intermittent. I read the message, misremembered, and went to the i386 directory, and 6.1.5 was missing, and I added it and assumed I

Re: Aw: Re: pkgin: mplayer-1.1.1nb1 is not available on the repository

Carsten Kunze carsten.ku...@arcor.de writes: Are not all packages available for all amd64 NetBSD releases? And if yes--why did pkgin not know this? You cannot distribute useful binary package for MPlayer for legal reasons. I know that from Linux, but had not expected it on NetBSD. This

Re: pkgin: mplayer-1.1.1nb1 is not available on the repository

Carsten Kunze carsten.ku...@arcor.de writes: on trying to install mplayer on NetBSD 6.1.4 amd64 I got the following output: # pkgin install mplayer calculating dependencies... done. nothing to upgrade. ... I did not setup a special server for that so the default server is used. Are not

Aw: Re: pkgin: mplayer-1.1.1nb1 is not available on the repository

Are not all packages available for all amd64 NetBSD releases? And if yes--why did pkgin not know this? You cannot distribute useful binary package for MPlayer for legal reasons. I know that from Linux, but had not expected it on NetBSD. But if that's the reason why does pkgin avail list

Aw: Re: pkgin: mplayer-1.1.1nb1 is not available on the repository

Did you do a pkgin up The system had been installed 3 days ago. I did not made an update, but if I do it does not change anything. by any chance? When I do a pkgin av it shows that mplayer-1.1.1nb3 Fast, cross-platform movie player is available. Exactly what I am saying.

Re: Re: pkgin: mplayer-1.1.1nb1 is not available on the repository

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:11:26AM +0200, Carsten Kunze wrote: Are not all packages available for all amd64 NetBSD releases? And if yes--why did pkgin not know this? You cannot distribute useful binary package for MPlayer for legal reasons. I know that from Linux, but had not expected

Re: Aw: Re: pkgin: mplayer-1.1.1nb1 is not available on the repository

On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Carsten Kunze wrote: But if that's the reason why does pkgin avail list it? Or do I have do setup an alternative server path to be able to install it? I assume the pkg_summary(5) database was created using a repo of packages that included some packages not allowed to be