Can I be assigned a test spec to do, I've done a few and enjoyed it, learned a
lot.
Walt
On Tuesday, October 23, 2018, 5:29:05 AM PDT, Walter Nyland
wrote:
I've done quite a few now, they're fun and easy, and I'm learning a lot of
functionality I never knew about before.
Please
Just ignore this...
One of those days.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018, 17:07 Leo Donahue wrote:
> Debian GNU/Linux 9.5 (stretch)
> Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64
> openjdk version "11.0.1" 2018-10-16
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.1+13)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build 11.0.1+13, mixed
Debian GNU/Linux 9.5 (stretch)
Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64
openjdk version "11.0.1" 2018-10-16
OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.1+13)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build 11.0.1+13, mixed mode)
svn, version 1.9.5 (r1770682)
compiled Jun 30 2018, 13:44:22 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
How would I report this:
This is all running on my internal network at home.
Debian GNU/Linux 9.5 (stretch)
Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64
openjdk version "11.0.1" 2018-10-16
OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.1+13)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build 11.0.1+13, mixed mode)
svn, version
On 10/23/2018 12:23 PM, Leo Donahue wrote:
> For someone who steps into NetCAT for their first time, I do wish the VCS
> Subversion specs did not build on the success of the previous test. One
> fail and you have to start all over to get to a stable IDE state, but the
> test after fail test
On 10/23/2018 02:45 PM, Alexander Romanenko wrote:
>> With respect to support for external tools like VCS, not using the IDE is
>> always a workaround, so are all issues related to VCS classified as major?
>
> Its only a workaround if the tool is advertising itself as "use at your own
> risk"
>
