On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 03:52:50AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
Remove duplicate entry for the same driver.
This is -mm specific. Andrew did not remove the add-3c59x-maintainer
patch after pushing it to mainline. This can be fixed just by removing
the add-3c59x-maintainer patch from -mm.
-
To
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 06:35:25 +0100
Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andi mentioned he did something like this already, but never
submitted it.
The dhcp client application uses AF_PACKET with a packet filter to
receive data. The application doesn't even use timestamps, but because
This patch fixes a potential null dereference bug where we dereference dev
before a null check. This patch simply moves the dereferencing after the null
check.
Signed-off-by: Micah Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- a/drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c
@@ -663,7 +663,7
This patch fixes a potential null dereference bug where we dereference dev
before a null check. This patch simply moves the dereferencing after the null
check.
Signed-off-by: Micah Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- a/drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c
@@ -663,7 +663,7
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 03:45:55AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
drivers/net/3c59x.c: In function 'vortex_up':
drivers/net/3c59x.c:1495: warning: 'err' may be used uninitialized in this
function
This came in with the recently applied 3c59x-check-return-of-pci_enable_device
patch
from Mark
Hi Micah,
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Micah Gruber wrote:
This patch fixes a potential null dereference bug where we dereference
dev before a null check. This patch simply moves the dereferencing after
the null check.
Signed-off-by: Micah Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
---
Hi Steffen,
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Steffen Klassert wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 03:45:55AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
drivers/net/3c59x.c: In function 'vortex_up':
drivers/net/3c59x.c:1495: warning: 'err' may be used uninitialized in this
function
This came in with the recently
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
Hi Micah,
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Micah Gruber wrote:
This patch fixes a potential null dereference bug where we dereference
dev before a null check. This patch simply moves the dereferencing after
the null check.
Signed-off-by: Micah
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 02:09:47PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
Hi Steffen,
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Steffen Klassert wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 03:45:55AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
drivers/net/3c59x.c: In function 'vortex_up':
drivers/net/3c59x.c:1495: warning: 'err' may be
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 09:53:31AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 02:09:47PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
Hi Steffen,
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Steffen Klassert wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 03:45:55AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
drivers/net/3c59x.c: In
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 11:17:57AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
The only warning that I was able to trigger with gcc 4.2 is in the case of a
.config
without PCI support. In this case I get
drivers/net/3c59x.c: In function 'vortex_up':
drivers/net/3c59x.c:1672: warning: 'err' is used
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 10:35:10AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 11:17:57AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
The only warning that I was able to trigger with gcc 4.2 is in the case of
a .config
without PCI support. In this case I get
drivers/net/3c59x.c: In
* Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-04 07:05
Thomas Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to reproduce this, what happens on my system
is that when the ISAKMP SA lifetime is exceeded the rekeying
fails and my connection dies. I can reproduce this back to
2.6.22 and it
On Mon, 2007-03-09 at 20:20 -0700, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
I didn't see much saving in interrupts on my machine (too fast, I guess).
You could try the idea suggested by Dave earlier and just turn interupts
for every nth packet. That should cut down the numbers.
I did see a significant
The sgiseeq driver is one of the few remaining users of the ancient
cache banging DMA API. Replaced with the modern days DMA API.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/net/sgiseeq.c b/drivers/net/sgiseeq.c
index 0fb74cb..eb67b02 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sgiseeq.c
-Original Message-
From: Denys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 6:12 AM
To: Rune Torgersen; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ethernet weirdness on 82xx
Thats normal.
Check arp_filter sysctl :
arp_filter - BOOLEAN
Thank you, that
Jeff Garzik wrote:
drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 26 +++
Hey, look, its identical to the patch I have here.
Acked-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
Kok, Auke wrote:
Marc Sigler wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have several systems with three integrated Intel 82559 (I *think*).
Does someone know if these boards support hardware interrupt
mitigation? I.e. is it possible to configure them to raise an IRQ
only if their hardware buffer is full
Bill Fink wrote:
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
It still won't work properly with TSO (TBF for example already drops
oversized packets during -enqueue), but its a good cleanup anyway.
Then lets call it a cleanup of the L2T macros.
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 23:16 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Lets focus on the general case, where the functionality actually is
needed right away.
In the general case:
- The rate table
Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
Auke Kok wrote:
Marc Sigler wrote:
I have several systems with three integrated Intel 82559 (I *think*).
Does someone know if these boards support hardware interrupt
mitigation? I.e. is it possible to configure them to raise an IRQ
only if their hardware buffer is
- Message d'origine -
De: Mandeep Singh Baines [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 20:20:36 -0700
Sujet: [PATCH] [sis900] convert to NAPI, WAS Re: pktgen terminating condition
Hi Daniele,
Attached is a patch for converting the sis900 driver to NAPI. Please take a
look at let me know
David Acker wrote:
On the systems that have cache incoherent DMA, including ARM, there is a
race condition between software allocating a new receive buffer and hardware
writing into a buffer. The two race on touching the last Receive Frame
Descriptor (RFD). It has its el-bit set and its next
On 9/4/07, jamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-09 at 20:20 -0700, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
I didn't see much saving in interrupts on my machine (too fast, I guess).
You could try the idea suggested by Dave earlier and just turn interupts
for every nth packet. That should cut
Cool. I'll try to see if I can clock my pc lower and run the
experiments again. I'll measure cpu utilization also this time around.
That should be useful for extrapolating.
Regards,
Mandeep
On 9/4/07, Daniele Venzano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Message d'origine -
De: Mandeep Singh
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Bill Fink wrote:
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
It still won't work properly with TSO (TBF for example already drops
oversized packets during -enqueue), but its a good cleanup
+ioc3-program-uart-predividers.patch
+sky2-fe-chip-support.patch
+sky2-use-debugfs-rename.patch
+sky2-document-gphy_ctrl-bits.patch
+sky2-dont-restrict-config-space-access.patch
+sky2-advanced-error-reporting.patch
+sky2-use-pci_config-access-functions.patch
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Francois Romieu wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
I have had abysmal performance trying to remotely run X apps via ssh on a
computer with a RTL8111 NIC. Saw this message and decided to give this
patch a try --- success! Much, much better.
Can you give
Build upon David Miller's initial patches to set the per-route rto_min
so users can specify the rto_min in the same units (milliseconds) in
which they are displayed. This is desirable because asking users to
convert to and from jiffies themselves, when there can be different
values of HZ from
John Sigler wrote:
Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
Auke Kok wrote:
Marc Sigler wrote:
I have several systems with three integrated Intel 82559 (I
*think*).
Does someone know if these boards support hardware interrupt
mitigation? I.e. is it possible to configure them to raise an IRQ
only
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
20070903-2.6.23-rc5-r8169-test.patch applied against 2.6.23-rc5 works fine.
Performance is acceptable.
Does acceptable mean that there is a noticeable difference when compared
to the patch based on a busy-waiting loop ?
Would you like me to *just*
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Francois Romieu wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
20070903-2.6.23-rc5-r8169-test.patch applied against 2.6.23-rc5 works fine.
Performance is acceptable.
Does acceptable mean that there is a noticeable difference when compared
to the patch based on a
Francois Romieu wrote:
Does acceptable mean that there is a noticeable difference when compared
to the patch based on a busy-waiting loop ?
Would you like me to *just* try patches 1 2, to help narrow down anything?
I expect patch #2 alone to be enough to enhance the performance. If
According to the comment in the net/core/sock.c code (in 2.6.20), I should be
able to pass a zero
optlen to the setsockopt method for SO_BINDTODEVICE:
case SO_BINDTODEVICE:
{
char devname[IFNAMSIZ];
/* Sorry... */
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 06:46:17AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Ishizaki Kou wrote:
This patch solves a problem that the spidernet driver sometimes fails
to handle IRQ.
The problem happens because,
- In Cell architecture, interrupts may arrive at an interrupt
controller, even if they are
This trivial patch removes the unneeded pointer iph, which is never used.
Signed-off-by: Micah Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- a/net/ipv6/ipcomp6.c2007-09-04 23:18:43.0 +0800
+++ b/net/ipv6/ipcomp6.c2007-09-05 00:48:05.0 +0800
@@ -65,7 +65,6 @@
static int
This trivial patch removes the unneeded pointer newdp, which is never used.
Signed-off-by: Micah Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c 2007-09-04 23:18:42.0 +0800
+++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c 2007-09-05 00:49:54.0 +0800
@@ -381,7 +381,6 @@
{
struct
37 matches
Mail list logo
