I have never been able to get my Yukon-EC Ultra (0xb4) rev 2 working
on anything past 2.6.18-4 that I've tried. (All ~.20+)
Below is the debug output from the driver on both versions. Notice the
'phy interrupt status' that each version prints out in case it is
involved in the problem:
2.6.18-4:
From: Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:35:07 +0100
tnode_alloc() already clears allocated memory, using kcalloc()
or alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO, ...)
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied, thanks Eric.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
It appears this problem might be caused by the system HPET timer not
functioning properly. I was noticing strange behavior in my rc0.d
shutdown scripts where the script would freeze in a 'sleep 1'. Sure
enough, even running a 'sleep 1' form a normal prompt just made the
system hang indefinitely
Hi Jeff,
Le samedi 12 janvier 2008, Jeff Garzik a écrit :
applied
Thank you. I think you will get this change twice when you pull Francoi's
netdev-2.6 repository which has the r6040 patches I sent already.
--
Cordialement, Florian Fainelli
--
--
To unsubscribe
CHECK net/x25/af_x25.c
net/x25/af_x25.c:117:46: warning: expensive signed divide
CHECK net/x25/x25_facilities.c
net/x25/x25_facilities.c:209:30: warning: expensive signed divide
CHECK net/x25/x25_in.c
net/x25/x25_in.c:250:26: warning: expensive signed divide
CHECK
net/ax25/ax25_route.c:251:13: warning: context imbalance in
'ax25_rt_seq_start' - wrong count at exit
net/ax25/ax25_route.c:276:13: warning: context imbalance in 'ax25_rt_seq_stop'
- unexpected unlock
net/ax25/ax25_std_timer.c:65:25: warning: expensive signed divide
net/ax25/ax25_uid.c:46:1:
Hi all,
The problem with IPsec SP/SA dumping is that they don't work well with large
SPD/SADB:s. In netlink the dumping code is O(n^2) and can miss some
entries/dump duplicates if the DB is changed between the recv() calls to read
the dump entries. This is due to the entry index counting done
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Since it seems to be 100% reproducible, it would be very helpful if you could
use git-bisect to identify the offending commit.
allright, bisect found the offending commit, here's what i've done:
first i started bisect with the following command (since i assumed
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 08:52 +0200, Andy Johnson wrote:
I saw somewhere (maybe in this mailing list a while ago) that there
might be a Linux Kernel Developers' Netconf conference at conf.au
2008.
Does anyone here know if such a thing is planned ?
Hi Andy,
I don't know.
However this
supersud501 wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Since it seems to be 100% reproducible, it would be very helpful if
you could
use git-bisect to identify the offending commit.
allright, bisect found the offending commit, here's what i've done:
first i started bisect with the following
Hi, got in dmesg
Not sure where to send (there is TCP), so sending netdev@ and kernel@
[159859.491752]
[159859.491755] =
[159859.492021] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[159859.492156] 2.6.24-rc7-devel #2
[159859.492284]
I think it should be in netdev_unregister_kobject(). But that would
only get rid of one of the two calls to synchronize_rcu() in the
unregister_netdev.
Would be already an improvement.
The other synchronize_rcu() is for qdisc's and not sure if that one can
be removed?
The standard way
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Francois Romieu wrote:
[...]
Distance from 'net-2.6/master' (27d1cba21fcc50c37eef5042c6be9fa7135e88fc)
-
[...]
hrm... tried to pull this, but received non-ipg stuff too
It is based on one
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:38:57PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
And guess why we don't do this? Because it's not part of
the key. Other aspects of the base fib_info and nexthops
provide the uniqueness, not the devindex of the first hop.
So you'll need to find another way to do this.
Ah,
Eric Dumazet a écrit :
4) full_children empty_children being 'unsigned short',
we probably are limited to 2^15 elements, but I could not
find this limit enforced somewhere.
Hi David
In my testings, I found that once a tnode is built with 2^16 slots (or more),
it cannot be freed.
also sprach Andy Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.01.12.0752 +0100]:
I saw somewhere (maybe in this mailing list a while ago) that
there might be a Linux Kernel Developers' Netconf conference at
conf.au 2008.
I think you may be mixing things up, and it may be my fault in ways.
I am developing
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:08:38 +0100 supersud501 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
supersud501 wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Since it seems to be 100% reproducible, it would be very helpful if
you could
use git-bisect to identify the offending commit.
allright, bisect found
Hi,
Please CC me in your responses (the way i do when i respond to you),
that way my filters prioritize your email.
On Sat, 2008-12-01 at 15:56 -0200, Dzianis Kahanovich wrote:
I in doubts only about action continue.
To and/or behaviour one of best usage are (example):
I dont think you
Andrew Morton wrote:
So simply reverting this:
commit ac93a3946b676025fa55356180e8321639744b31
Author: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon Nov 5 15:52:08 2007 -0800
sky2: enable PCI config writes
On some boards, PCI configuration space access is turned off by
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:27:40 +0100 supersud501 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
So simply reverting this:
commit ac93a3946b676025fa55356180e8321639744b31
Author: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon Nov 5 15:52:08 2007 -0800
sky2: enable PCI
On Sunday, 13 of January 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
2.6.23 also has this warning in sky2_err_intr() but it doesn't trigger
there. Rafael, I think we'd have to class this as a post-2.6.23
regression.
Yes, it's been being tracked already.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
I wonder if commit 84cd2dfb04d23a961c5f537baa243fa54d0987ac
sky2: remove check for PCI wakeup setting from BIOS has anything to do with
it, btw.
supersud501, can you please check if the bug is still present in the current
Linus' tree?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Matti Linnanvuori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-3) Do not forget that once you return 0 from your hard_start_xmit
+3) A hard_start_xmit method must not modify the shared parts of the SKB.
Only if it's cloned.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideas?
Please provide a packet dump on both sides (or at least the sender
side).
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key:
Eric Dumazet writes:
Eric Dumazet a écrit :
4) full_children empty_children being 'unsigned short',
we probably are limited to 2^15 elements, but I could not
find this limit enforced somewhere.
Two fixes are possible : Enlarge full_children empty_children to 32bits,
or
Francois Romieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Francois Romieu wrote:
[...]
Distance from 'net-2.6/master' (27d1cba21fcc50c37eef5042c6be9fa7135e88fc)
-
[...]
hrm... tried to pull this, but
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I wonder if commit 84cd2dfb04d23a961c5f537baa243fa54d0987ac
sky2: remove check for PCI wakeup setting from BIOS has anything to do with
it, btw.
supersud501, can you please check if the bug is still present in the current
Linus' tree?
I checked it (after git
On Thursday January 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 03:13:48PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
What guarantees that it doesn't happen before we get to callback? AFAICS,
nothing whatsoever...
Yes, that's bad isn't it :-)
I think I should be using
From: Glen Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:23:45 +1030
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 08:52 +0200, Andy Johnson wrote:
I saw somewhere (maybe in this mailing list a while ago) that there
might be a Linux Kernel Developers' Netconf conference at conf.au
2008.
Does anyone
From: Benjamin LaHaise [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:58:49 -0500
Ah, you're right indeed. It's probably easier for me to change how the
daemon adds the local ip address for these point to point interfaces.
I guess you didn't understand, I checked in the following
patch which
From: martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:17:51 +0100
also sprach Andy Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.01.12.0752 +0100]:
I saw somewhere (maybe in this mailing list a while ago) that
there might be a Linux Kernel Developers' Netconf conference at
conf.au 2008.
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 09:56 -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
The test command is:
#sudo taskset -c 7 ./netserver
#sudo taskset -c 0 ./netperf -t TCP_RR -l 60 -H 127.0.0.1 -i 50,3 -I 99,5
-- -r 1,1
A couple of comments/questions on the command lines:
Thanks for your kind comments.
*)
Herbert Xu wrote:
Patrick, please have a look at the former. In fact it's not just
that ihl may be bogus (which might be harmless as long as the REJECT
hook only gets called from within the IP stack), I think REJECT would
also do the wrong thing if the packet had IP options. So perhaps we
From: Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:33:01 +0100
CHECK net/x25/af_x25.c
net/x25/af_x25.c:117:46: warning: expensive signed divide
CHECK net/x25/x25_facilities.c
net/x25/x25_facilities.c:209:30: warning: expensive signed divide
CHECK net/x25/x25_in.c
From: Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:09:22 +0100
But I agree to your suggestion, that will allow us to properly
handle packets with IP options. I'll take care of this.
Thanks a lot Patrick.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the
From: Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:30:00 +0100
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied to net-2.6, thanks Eric.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:01:28 +0100
net/ax25/ax25_route.c:251:13: warning: context imbalance in
'ax25_rt_seq_start' - wrong count at exit
net/ax25/ax25_route.c:276:13: warning: context imbalance in
'ax25_rt_seq_stop'
- unexpected unlock
From: Robert Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:02:11 +0100
Eric Dumazet writes:
Eric Dumazet a écrit :
4) full_children empty_children being 'unsigned short',
we probably are limited to 2^15 elements, but I could not
find this limit enforced somewhere.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/net/802/tr.c b/net/802/tr.c
index a2bd0f2..1e115e5 100644
--- a/net/802/tr.c
+++ b/net/802/tr.c
@@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ struct net_device *alloc_trdev(int sizeof_priv)
static int __init rif_init(void)
{
init_timer(rif_timer);
-
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:40:10 +0200
Ilpo Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...snip...
built-in.o:
12 functions changed, 250 bytes added, 1695 bytes removed, diff: -1445
...snip...
include/net/tcp.h | 35
From: Ilpo_Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:43:08 +0200 (EET)
So which test case you prefer? :-) Is iso-8859-1 from+content ok? Or
should I keep trying to live with mixed utf-8 which I didn't got even
fully working last time because git-send-email is probably either too
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, David Miller wrote:
From: Ilpo_Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:59:50 +0200 (EET)
...Maybe I just fall-back to changing my last name, it's the only
full-proof solution... ;-)
Don't do this! Otherwise I won't have a frequent test case to make
42 matches
Mail list logo
