In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sat, 27 May 2006 21:33:45 +1000), Herbert Xu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> As far as I can gather it's an attempt to guard against the removal of
> the corresponding modules. Since neither module can be unloaded at all
> we can leave it to whoever fixes up IPv6 u
David,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 26 May 2006 13:44:59 +0300 (EEST)),
Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> >> The unreachable route works now but LAN routing still does not work.
> >> Locally generated ICMPv6 packets that should go to LAN interface still
> >> go to tun6to4.
> >
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 26 May 2006 11:35:53 +0300 (EEST)),
Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> The unreachable route works now but LAN routing still does not work.
> Locally generated ICMPv6 packets that should go to LAN interface still
> go to tun6to4.
Please try this.
-
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 26 May 2006 02:24:19 +0300 (EEST)),
Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
> (To YOSHIFUJI Hideaki: this is about the
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/35262 thread)
>
> Tracked it down to IPV6 merge at 2006-03-21:
> commit cd85f6e2f5828218
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sat, 06 May 2006 17:13:29 +0100), Simon
Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> +void neigh_table_init(struct neigh_table *tbl)
> +{
> + struct neigh_table *tmp;
> +
> + neigh_table_init_no_netlink(tbl);
> + write_lock(&neigh_tbl_lock);
> + for (tmp = neigh_table
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sat, 06 May 2006 01:53:21 +0100), David
Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> There is a default route, because I believe that's the only thing that
> radvd can do. I cannot advertise a route to _only_ fec0::/16, can I?
Yes, you can, via Route Information optio
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 05 May 2006 17:40:11 -0700 (PDT)),
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 12:24:52 +0900 (JST)
>
> > Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> It is critical that w
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 05 May 2006 22:00:32 +0100), David
Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Since updating the kernel to 2.6.16, I've got problems with external
> connectivity to hosts which have both IPv4 and (Global) IPv6 addresses
> in DNS. Glibc used to return the IPv4 ad
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/include/net/addrconf.h b/include/net/addrconf.h
index 750e250..74dca37 100644
--- a/include/net/addrconf.h
+++ b/include/net/addrconf.h
@@ -127,20 +127,18 @@ extern int unregister_inet6addr_notifier
static inline struct inet6_dev *
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 3 May 2006 22:07:40 +0400), Evgeniy
Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> > Even if the hardware cannot fully implement netfilter rules
> > there is still value in having an interface that documents
> > exactly how much filtering a given piece of hardware c
Hello.
We eliminated rt6_dflt_lock (to protect default router pointer)
at 2.6.17-rc1, and introduced rt6_select() for general router selection.
The function is called in the context of rt6_lock read-lock held,
but this means, we have some race conditions when we do round-robin.
Am I correct?
If
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:49:14 -0700 (PDT)),
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> All applied, and I agree with pushing 1-3 into -stable,
> please send it.
Done. Thanks.
--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the
[IPV6]: Ensure to have hop-by-hop options in our header of &sk_buff.
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/ipv6/exthdrs.c | 12
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
7bcedcc73a45a5577103422c33e01f1633173984
diff --git a/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c b/net
[IPV6] XFRM: Don't use old copy of pointer after pskb_may_pull().
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
83e25b9fb69b2c04ebfec2ee2b9fe95e5a7c0584
diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c b/net/i
[IPV6] XFRM: Fix decoding session with preceding extension header(s).
We did not correctly decode session with preceding extension
header(s). This was because we had already pulled preceding
headers, skb->nh.raw + 40 + 1 - skb->data was minus, and
pskb_may_pull() failed.
We now have IP6CB(skb)->
[IPV6]: Clean up hop-by-hop options handler.
- Removed unused argument (nhoff) for ipv6_parse_hopopts().
- Make ipv6_parse_hopopts() to align with other extension header
handlers.
- Removed pointless assignment (hdr), which is not used afterwards.
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hello.
Following changesets fix several errors in extension header handling.
I'd propose to push them (except 4/4, maybe) to -stable.
[PATCH 1/4] [IPV6]: Ensure to have hop-by-hop options in our header of &sk_buff.
[PATCH 2/4] [IPV6] XFRM: Don't use old copy of pointer after pskb_may_pull().
[PAT
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 30 Mar 2006 16:39:14 +0200), Peter
Bieringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> IPv6:
> # ip -6 route show table cache
> ff02::1 via ff02::1 dev eth0 metric 0
> cache mtu 1280 advmss 1220 metric 10 4294967295
> ff02::1:ffea:7781 via ff02::1:ffea:7781
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:34:12 +), Hugo
Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>This patch fixes a soft lockup when encapsulated packets reach
> ip6ip6_rcv() and there is no tunnel associated with it. The error
> path returns a positive value (1) which will trigg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 7 Mar 2006 11:26:13 +0100), Ingo Oeser
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> What about sth. like this simple defensive patch instead
> (against Linux 2.6.16-rc4)?
I disagree again. Sorry.
--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netd
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:50:33 +0100),
Jean-Mickael Guerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Hi,
>
> This patch fixes potential null pointer dereference (I never experiment
> such crash).
> The patch is made for net-2.6.17.
I disagree.
It never happen, because (void *)
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 6 Mar 2006 02:34:16 -0500), Dave Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> We've already dereferenced 'np' a dozen
> times at this point, so it's safe to say it's not null.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Agreed.
--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe fro
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:03:31 -0500), Brian
Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> The scope element in the ipv6_saddr_score struct used in
> ipv6_dev_get_saddr() is an unsigned integer, but __ipv6_addr_src_scope()
> returns a signed integer (and can return -1).
>
> S
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:34:48 -0500), John
Zielinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> I'm having a strange problem with my server machine. When I use an MTU
> of 9000 I get a throughput of only 45-65Mbit/sec not counting TCP/IP
> overhead. Receiving I get around 310M
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:10:18 -0800 (PST)),
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:23:51 +0900 (JST)
>
> > David, please apply. Thank you.
>
> Can you please resend the patch w
Hello.
If net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding is !0 when bringing up the interface,
we failed to join all routers multicast address, while we join/leave if we
enable/disable net.ipv6.conf.ethX.forwarding later.
This is inconsistent because we assume that we join all routers multicast
if and only if
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:05:23 -0500), jamal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> diff --git a/include/linux/xfrm.h b/include/linux/xfrm.h
> index 82fbb75..b54a129 100644
> --- a/include/linux/xfrm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/xfrm.h
:
> @@ -235,6 +258,11 @@ struct xfrm_usersa_id
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sun, 19 Feb 2006 15:54:13 +0100), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] says:
> Yes, Hugo Santos suggested me to use the minimum of both, the new
> patch is available there :
>
> http://clarinet.u-strasbg.fr/~hoerdt/ip6_output.c.softfrag.patch2
Do you mean like this?
Signed-off-
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:47:09 +0100), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] says:
> The fix is very simple, it only grab the value of frag_size and
> use it in ip6_fragment file, could you please review the patch which
> fix that problem at :
>
> http://clarinet.u-strasbg.fr/~hoerdt/i
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:38:42 +0100), Olivier
MATZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> in skb_clone(), the following code is done twice :
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) || defined(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MODULE)
> C(nfct_reasm);
> nf_conntrack_get_rea
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:23:28 +), Al Viro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> In linux/igmp.h:
>
> struct ip_mc_list
> {
> struct in_device*interface;
> unsigned long multiaddr;
> struct ip_sf_list *sources;
>
> and AFAICS all
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:37:18 +0100), Ingo Oeser
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> From: Ingo Oeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Here are some possible (and trivial) cleanups.
> - use kzalloc() where possible
> - remove unused label
> - invert allocation failure test
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:36:16 +0100), Ingo Oeser
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Here are some possible (and trivial) cleanups.
:
> - remove unused label
> @@ -3193,7 +3190,6 @@ static int inet6_fill_ifinfo(struct sk_b
> kfree(array);
> return skb->l
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:59:31 -0800 (PST)),
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> > Good spot. Please drop {}, otherwise, I agree. Thank you.
>
> I'll take care of fixing that when I put in the fix.
Okay, thanks.
Acked-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROT
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:17:24 +0200), Kristian
Slavov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> During NETDEV_DOWN we clear IF_READY, and we don't set it back in
> NETDEV_UP. While starting to perform DAD on the link-local address, we
> notice that the device is not in
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:09:44 -0800 (PST)),
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:32:13 +0900 (JST)
>
> > BTW, David, would you mind sending your addrconf patches to me?
> > I'd like to
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:48:49 +1100), Herbert Xu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:31:58AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@
> wrote:
> >
> > We SHALL do autoconf when we "up" an ipv6-capable device.
> > It is the IPv6.
>
> I don't think
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 2 Feb 2006 23:42:25 +1100), Herbert Xu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 05:37:22AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >
> > > Yes you are right. The locking/refcounting in addrconf.c is such
> > > a mess. I've asked a number of times bef
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 01 Feb 2006 17:28:10 -0800), Roland
Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Sorry to distract everyone from the VJ channel discussion, but on the
> other hand it looks like Dave is back... I'm resending this because
> I'd really like to get this problem fixed bu
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:35:08 +0100),
Jean-Mickael Guerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Following patch drops this flag. As you can see, it requires to set the
> flag back to RTF_EXPIRES in ndisc_router_discovery(), because
> rt6_add_dflt_router() asks a new route w
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:25:56 -0800), "Kris
Katterjohn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Okey-dokey.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kris Katterjohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --- x/net/packet/af_packet.c 2006-01-25 22:18:41.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 25 Jan 2006 19:46:07 -0800), "Kris
Katterjohn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> @@ -1399,6 +1423,17 @@ static int packet_getsockopt(struct sock
> return -EINVAL;
>
> switch(optname) {
> + case PACKET_ACCUMULATE_STATISTICS:
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:13:26 -0800), "Kris
Katterjohn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> +
> + case PACKET_ACCUMULATE_STATISTICS:
> + {
> + int val;
> +
> + if (optlen != sizeof(val))
> + return -EINVAL;
I thi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:12:02 -0700), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) says:
> By bringing down the routes before we bring down the addresses we leak
> the dst cache entries held by the addresses.
:
> Fix this by simply moving rt6_ifdown where we flush the rout
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:38:26 -0800), "Kris
Katterjohn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> + if (optlen != sizeof val)
sizeof(val)
Please use "sizeof(foo)" instead of "sizeof foo".
> --- x/include/linux/if_packet.h
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sat, 7 Jan 2006 10:05:52 -0800), "Kris
Katterjohn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> PACKET_AUTO_STATISTICS is the default and the kernel will zero the packet
> statistics when the PACKET_STATISTICS getsockopt() call is used.
> + case PACKET_AUTO_STATISTI
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:33:59 -0500), Andy
Gospodarek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> On 1/16/06, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > Maybe if you described "your current problem" someone could suggest a
> > solution...
> >
>
> Sure, I'd be glad to. If I
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:59:20 +1100), Shaun
Pereira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> If I understand correctly from your comments (thanks for that, they are
> helpful)
> copy_to_user acts like a memcopy for an 'array' of bytes and should not
> be used to copy the timeval
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:29:24 -0800 (PST)),
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> > changes all code to use NIP6_FMT
> > fixes net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
:
> This looks good, applied, thanks Joe.
As I have commented in another mail, the original patch
Hello.
Well, basic idea is okay. But...
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:14:48 -0800), Joe
Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index 7129d42..dfb4f14 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sat, 7 Jan 2006 02:09:30 +0100 (MET)),
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> following are the remaining patches for netfilter IPsec support.
> They are missing the common-case optimization for inner transport mode
> SAs on the input path, but since its j
Use macro for spinlock_t definition.
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/net/econet/af_econet.c b/net/econet/af_econet.c
index 34fdac5..cefc26d 100644
--- a/net/econet/af_econet.c
+++ b/net/econet/af_econet.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static struct net_device *net2dev_map[25
Use macro for rwlock_t initialization.
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/net/ipv6/mcast.c b/net/ipv6/mcast.c
index f829a4a..1cf305a 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/mcast.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/mcast.c
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ int ipv6_sock_mc_join(struct sock *sk, i
mc_lst->i
Use macro for spinlock_t/rwlock_t initializations/definition.
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
index c2c52af..f3e5ffb 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
+++ b/net/
Hello.
Again, we need to fix one more dead lock... sorry..
We need to release idev->lcok before we call addrconf_dad_stop().
It calls ipv6_addr_del(), which will hold idev->lock.
Bug spotted by Yasuyuki KOZAKAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git
Hello.
Chinen-san has run tests against current net-2.6.16 tree.
We could run tests (Phase-1 for Host, Phase-2 Core for Host),
we see some regression in IPv6 neighbor discovery.
We have not tracked down closely yet.
FYI, you can find the result (IPv6 Ready Logo Phase-2 Core
(Host)) at:
http://t
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:35:52 -0200), Arnaldo
Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/sundance.c b/drivers/net/sundance.c
> index 0ab9c38..8cdeb5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/sundance.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/sundance.c
> @@ -633,9 +633,13
From: Hiroyuki YAMAMORI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Since regen_count is stored in the public address, we need to reset it
when we start renewing temporary address.
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 510220f..745aa43 100644
-
Hello.
Sorry, I introduced a dead-lock by the latest NETDEV_CHANGE patch.
We need to relesae ifp->lock before we call addrconf_dad_stop(),
which will hold ifp->lock.
Please apply this.
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
in
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 22 Dec 2005 03:54:29 -0500), Jeff
Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> I'm not sure all drivers have been converted to use netif_carrier_ok(),
> which would imply that IPv6 would now be broken on all drivers that do
> not yet support it?
I don't think so.
Hello.
I'm sorry for taking last minutes.
Please pull the following changesets and push them to the 2.6.15 queue.
These fix, basically, random "FAIL"s in IPv6 Ready Logo Phase-2
Self Test in IPv6 Core Protocols.
Changesets are available at:
git://git.skbuff.net/gitroot/yoshfuji/linux-2.6.1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:28:25 +0200), Kristian
Slavov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> If you add more than one IPv6 address belonging to the same prefix and
> delete the address that was last added, routing table entry for that
> prefix is also deleted.
:
> Signed-off
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:59:35 +0100), Patrick
McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
:
> > BTW, we're now using full of skb->cb
> > (and we are even exceeding it w/ mobile-ipv6 extensions)...
>
> Not in mainline so far, so maybe we can fit yo
Hello.
Please apply the following patch to 2.6.15 tree.
Thank you.
---
[IPV6]: Fix route lifetime.
The route expiration time is stored in rt6i_expires in jiffies.
The argument of rt6_route_add() for adding a route is not the
expiration time in jiffies nor in clock_t, but the lifetime
(or time le
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:27:01 +0100), Patrick
McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 22 Nov 2005 02:14:26 +0100),
> > Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> >
> >
> >>The easiest way would be
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:57:42 -0800 (PST)),
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:03:55 +0900 (JST)
>
> > BTW, will you please capitalize labels in enums?
>
> Andi suggested using func
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:20:08 -0800 (PST)),
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> So what I've done is move these operations into base context using
> workqueues. Packet initiated events simply schedule a workqueue
> event, and the actual processing occurs
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 9 Dec 2005 12:02:03 +0200 (EET)), Pekka
Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> How do you differentiate between these two cases? One is valid while
> the other is not, but both seem valid to me.
>
> default via fe80::20a:5eff:fe51:7d58 dev eth1 proto kernel
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 9 Dec 2005 11:45:04 +0200 (EET)), Pekka
Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> 1) after reboot (card in slot), default route shows up, but does not
> get renewed. After timer expiry, the expiry timer seems to wrap
> around, and after a couple of seconds, the
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:04:30 -0800 (PST)),
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> net/ipv6/af_inet.c:inet6_create() has a similar problem and
> it also is missing the module load logic the ipv4 counterpart
> has.
>
> Anyone up for cooking up a fix for those
Hello.
Ensure to update hiscore.rule in dummy rule 4 in ipv6_dev_get_saddr().
Pointed out by Yan Zheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index a16064b..76ff9f4 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/ne
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:14:48 -0800 (PST)),
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> I've implemented the necessary logic for TCP and UDP, but every other
> possible legitimate receiver of PKT_TOOBIG messages (RAW, SCTP, DCCP,
> AH6, ESP6, etc. etc. etc.) will
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 22 Nov 2005 02:14:26 +0100), Patrick
McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> The easiest way would be to store nhoff somewhere in the skb and
> use it to continue at the next header. But I still hope there is
> a way without keeping data in the skb.
We
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:34:38 -0800 (PST)),
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> I want to do this so that Patrick doesn't have to repost
> 13 or so patches every time one of the parts still under
> discussion gets changed.
>
> Actually, it seems the only
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:31:41 +0900), Kazunori
Miyazawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Your ip_xfrm_transport_hook is a good idea, I think.
>
> We could call ip6_rcv_finish if the netfilter changed the addresses
> or otherwise we can continue the loop to avoid
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:44:27 +0800), Yan Zheng
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> I get follow message when switch to single user mode and the kernel version
> is 2.6.15-rc1-git5.
:
> Nov 18 08:26:23 localhost kernel: Debug: sleeping function called from
> invalid conte
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:12:36 +0900 (JST)),
Yasuyuki KOZAKAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> [IPV4,IPV6] replace handmade list with hlist in IPv{4,6} reassembly
> Signed-off-by: Yasuyuki Kozakai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 15 Nov 2005 17:20:50 -0500), Vlad
Yasevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> No, according to RFC 4007, loopback is considered a link-local
> address.
Agreed. RFC3484 also explicitly says that loopback is treated as link-local.
--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:42:30 +0800), Yan Zheng
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> The "score.rule++" doesn't make any sense for me.
> According to codes above, I think it should be "hiscore.rule++;" .
Oops, you're right.
> Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ac
Hello.
David, this is what I promised before.
Please pull the following changesets, which implement
the source address selection algorythm described in RFC3484; e.g.:
- avoid using daprecated address
- prefer address in appropriate scope / on appropriate interface
- (minimum support of) matc
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 09 Sep 2005 23:31:32 +0200), Patrick
McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> > --- a/include/linux/in6.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/in6.h
>
> > +#define IPV6_RECVHOPLIMIT 64
> > +#define IPV6_HOPLIMIT 65
>
> 64 and 65 are already in use by ip6_tabl
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] [IPV6]: Support IPV6_{RECV,}TCLASS socket options /
ancillary data.
Based on patch from David L Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: David L Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/in6.h |2 --
incl
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV6]: Support several new sockopt / ancillary data in
Advanced API (RFC3542).
Support several new socket options / ancillary data:
IPV6_RECVPKTINFO, IPV6_PKTINFO,
IPV6_RECVHOPOPTS, IPV6_HOPOPTS,
IPV6_RECVDSTOPTS, IPV6_DSTOPTS, IPV6_RTHDRDSTOPTS,
IPV6_RECVRTHDR, IPV6
Hello.
Please pull the following patches from
.
[PATCH 1/2] [IPV6]: Support several new sockopt / ancillary data in Advanced
API (RFC3542).
[PATCH 2/2] [IPV6]: Support IPV6_{RECV,}TCLASS socket options / ancillary data.
Thank you.
--
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki @ USAGI Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG-
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 06 Sep 2005 13:05:16 -0700), Ben Greear
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> neigh->nud_state = NUD_INCOMPLETE;
> *** neigh_hold(neigh, NDRK_NEIGH_TIMER);
> neigh->timer.expires = now + 1;
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sat, 3 Sep 2005 11:27:56 +0100), Russell
King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> While trying to build a kernel with CONFIG_SYSCTL disabled, the following
> error occurs:
>
> CC net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.o
> net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c: In function `ip_setsockopt':
> net
Hello.
Due to changes to enforce checking interface bindings,
sockets did not see loopback packets bound for our local address
on our interface.
e.g.)
When we ping6 fe80::1%eth0, skb->dev points loopback_dev while
IP6CB(skb)->iif indicates eth0.
This patch fixes the issue by using appropriat
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:08:28 +0200), Thomas
Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Collection of cleanups for fib6_lookup() that used to live in my tree
> for a while now.
>
> Yoshfuji-san, what's the plan for CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES? Is MIPL
> going to use it or can we re
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:58:36 -0700 (PDT)),
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> It also is a preferred change than your minimal version
> because it makes the ip6 input path very similar to
> the ipv4 variant, so it's easier to verify the two pieces
> of c
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:04:10 -0700 (PDT)),
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 05:52:06 +0200
>
> > David S. Miller wrote:
> > > Applied to both net-2.6 and net-2.6.14
> >
> > BTW, the I
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:40:24 -0300), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] (Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo) says:
> [INET6_HASHTABLES] Move inet6_lookup functions to net/ipv4/inet6_hashtables.c
>
> Doing this we allow tcp_diag to support IPV6 even if tcp_diag is compiled
> statically and IP
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sun, 07 Aug 2005 20:33:38 +0200), Balazs
Scheidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Commit log says it all.
> + xfrm_state_bydst = (struct list_head *) __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL,
> get_order(sizeof(struct list_head) * XFRM_DST_HSIZE * 2));
Please check the
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 21 Jul 2005 21:44:43 +0100), Andrew
McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> I guess the fix would be a matter of changing:
>
> if (sk && ra->sel == sel) {
>
> to:
>
> if (sk && ra->sel == sel &&
> (!sk->sk_bound_dev_if ||
> sk->sk_bound_dev_if == s
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:12:27 -0700 (PDT)),
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:06:38 -0400 (EDT)
>
> > No, please, please do not break binaries, whenever it is possible.
> > It is de
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 22 Jul 2005 22:55:14 +0200), Thomas
Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> * Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-07-22 13:48
> > I don't see how the ematch iproute2 stuff depends on SKB shrinking.
> > The CVS repository has the latest ematch stuff, just te
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 1 Jul 2005 18:15:50 -0600), David
Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> This patch corrects a few problems with the IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP
> socket option:
> 1) The existing code makes an attempt at reference counting joins when
> using the ip_mreq
401 - 496 of 496 matches
Mail list logo
