On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 11:32 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 09:32 -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> > I'm not sure why this hasn't been done before because it seems obvious,
> > so maybe there is some reason that memcpy is used instead of
> > ether_addr_copy in this code. But let's try
On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 09:32 -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> I'm not sure why this hasn't been done before because it seems obvious,
> so maybe there is some reason that memcpy is used instead of
> ether_addr_copy in this code. But let's try this anyway.
>
> Change memcpy to ether_addr_copy.
...
>
On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 09:32 -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> I'm not sure why this hasn't been done before because it seems obvious,
> so maybe there is some reason that memcpy is used instead of
> ether_addr_copy in this code. But let's try this anyway.
>
> Change memcpy to ether_addr_copy.
I looked
On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 09:41 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 09:32 -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> > I'm not sure why this hasn't been done before because it seems obvious,
> > so maybe there is some reason that memcpy is used instead of
> > ether_addr_copy in this code. But let's try
I'm not sure why this hasn't been done before because it seems obvious,
so maybe there is some reason that memcpy is used instead of
ether_addr_copy in this code. But let's try this anyway.
Change memcpy to ether_addr_copy.
Signed-off-by: Greg Rose
---
net/ethernet/eth.c