From: John Stultz
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 17:01:24 -0700
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 04 May 2016 23:08:11 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>>> > But I'm less comfortable making the call on
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2016 23:08:11 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> > But I'm less comfortable making the call on this one. It looks
>> > relatively straight forward, but it would be good to have maintainer
On Wed, 04 May 2016 23:08:11 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > But I'm less comfortable making the call on this one. It looks
> > relatively straight forward, but it would be good to have maintainer
> > acks before I add it to my tree.
>
> Agreed. Feel free to add my
>
>
On Wednesday 04 May 2016 13:04:37 John Stultz wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Deepa Dinamani
> wrote:
> > struct timespec is not y2038 safe.
> > Even though timespec might be sufficient to represent
> > timeouts, use struct timespec64 here as the plan is to
> >