On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 08:21:49AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
I don't anticipate the d80211 naming conventions to ever make it out
of wireless-dev. By the time we are ready to push that stuff upstream,
we will have cleaned-up our messes.
Yes, absolutely.
This does raise the question:
On Saturday 05 August 2006 13:46, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 08:21:49AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
I don't anticipate the d80211 naming conventions to ever make it out
of wireless-dev. By the time we are ready to push that stuff upstream,
we will have cleaned-up
On Saturday 05 August 2006 19:30, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Saturday 05 August 2006 13:46, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 08:21:49AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
I don't anticipate the d80211 naming conventions to ever make it out
of wireless-dev. By the time we are
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 01:51:31PM -0700, Michael Wu wrote:
On Monday 31 July 2006 13:31, John W. Linville wrote:
As usual I'll depend on Jiri to merge d80211 stack patches, then
send me a pull request. If I apply your Switch drivers to d80211
series now, that will undoutedly cause a
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:56:50AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 01:51:31PM -0700, Michael Wu wrote:
On Monday 31 July 2006 13:31, John W. Linville wrote:
As usual I'll depend on Jiri to merge d80211 stack patches, then
send me a pull request. If I apply your
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:56:50AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
NACK again. Driver should continue to use the ieee80211.h header forever.
When a patch that renames constants in d80211 is merged and d80211 stack
is moved to ieee80211/ directory, there will be only slight changes (if
any)
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 03:58:37PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
Do you have a plan when you will merge rt2x00 patches so I can apply
Michael's renaming patch(es) without risk of conflicts?
Working on it ~now. I hit a snag in that Ivo's patches seem to rely on
his radio button patch, which I had
Hi,
Do you have a plan when you will merge rt2x00 patches so I can apply
Michael's renaming patch(es) without risk of conflicts?
Working on it ~now. I hit a snag in that Ivo's patches seem to rely on
his radio button patch, which I had ignored until now. I'll probably
pull that in this
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 04:25:05PM +0200, Ivo Van Doorn wrote:
Hi,
Do you have a plan when you will merge rt2x00 patches so I can apply
Michael's renaming patch(es) without risk of conflicts?
Working on it ~now. I hit a snag in that Ivo's patches seem to rely on
his radio button patch,
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 19:11, John W. Linville wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 04:25:05PM +0200, Ivo Van Doorn wrote:
Hi,
Do you have a plan when you will merge rt2x00 patches so I can apply
Michael's renaming patch(es) without risk of conflicts?
Working on it ~now. I hit a
On 06-08-01 15:58 Jiri Benc wrote:
pointing non-migrated drivers (ipw2[12]00, zd1211rw) at the old
code,
Yes. Rather than moving, zd1211 should be ported to d80211 - this will
also allow using of more advanced features of the hw.
I have currently no idea, when this will happen. Currently
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 12:37:14AM -0700, Michael Wu wrote:
Alright, I've replaced all + lines with spaces with tabs.
I also fixed one long line. The rest of them are nearly impossible to shorten
well. The (fc IEEE80211_FCTL_FTYPE) == IEEE80211_FTYPE_DATA style is
really killing us
On Monday 31 July 2006 13:31, John W. Linville wrote:
As usual I'll depend on Jiri to merge d80211 stack patches, then
send me a pull request. If I apply your Switch drivers to d80211
series now, that will undoutedly cause a breakage when Jiri asks me
to pull this later.
Yeah, there needs to
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:02:50 -0700, Michael Wu wrote:
These two attached patches also roll in a switch to MAC_FMT and MAC_ARG, and
use IEEE80211_DATA_LEN when possible. Otherwise, it's the same as before
except split into two patches.
Nice, thanks a lot.
One more thing (hopefully the last
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 09:32, Jiri Benc wrote:
One more thing (hopefully the last one), could you try to keep lines
under 80 characters? I understand that with such long identifiers it is
not always possible (it dramatically reduces readability of the code if
you try to force the limit in
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:43:55 -0700, Michael Wu wrote:
I still want to convert d80211_mgmt.h. Once that's done, I'll look through
for
those tabs/spaces long lines formatting issues. I won't mind if you start
fixing some of those issues now, however. :)
I just meant running some s/ {8}/\t/
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 09:53, Jiri Benc wrote:
I just meant running some s/ {8}/\t/ on your patch :-)
Also, I don't want to fix all of tab issues in d80211 by one big patch.
I always have several patches pending (and other people probably too)
and it leads to unnecessary rejects when
17 matches
Mail list logo
