On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:44:16AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Simon Horman
> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 13:13:16 +0200
>
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:20:22AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Jamal Hadi Salim
> >> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017
From: Simon Horman
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 13:13:16 +0200
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:20:22AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Jamal Hadi Salim
>> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:42:32 -0400
>>
>> > So are we going to standardize these strings?
>>
On 04/26/2017 03:03 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
On 17-04-26 07:13 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
I don't feel strongly about this and perhaps it can be revisited at some
point but perhaps it would be worth documenting that he strings do not
form part of the UAPI as my expectation would have been that
On 17-04-26 07:13 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
I don't feel strongly about this and perhaps it can be revisited at some
point but perhaps it would be worth documenting that he strings do not
form part of the UAPI as my expectation would have been that they do f.e. to
facilitate internationalisation.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:20:22AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jamal Hadi Salim
> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:42:32 -0400
>
> > So are we going to standardize these strings?
>
> No.
>
> > i.e what if some user has written a bash script that depends on this
> > string
From: Jamal Hadi Salim
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:42:32 -0400
> So are we going to standardize these strings?
No.
> i.e what if some user has written a bash script that depends on this
> string and it gets changed later.
They can't do that.
It's free form extra information
Good stuff. Question below:
On 17-04-25 04:06 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
Try to carry error messages to the user via the netlink extended
[..]
+nfp_net_check_config(struct nfp_net *nn, struct nfp_net_dp *dp,
+struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
/* XDP-enabled tests