From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 22:08:01 +1000
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Sat, 27 May 2006 21:33:45 +1000),
Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
As far as I can gather it's an attempt to guard against the
From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 21:32:36 +1000
These patches abstract out the protocol-specific encapsulation parts of
IPsec into what I've termed xfrm_mode objects. This allows us to share
a little bit more code. But more importantly, it allows us to add new
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 02:10:17PM -0700, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
What kind of poor performance? what test? please send the output of
ethtool -e ethX and ethtool -S ethX after you've been having problems.
I first noticed the problem (slow speed) when pinging sites. I then
noticed that the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Sat, 27 May 2006 23:03:02 -0700 (PDT)),
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
Please don't get me wrong. What I removed here doesn't work at all to
begin with. I was just pointing out the possible reason why this code
existed in the first place.
Right
Hi all
Using the zd1211rw driver on a ppc under Sarge, 2.6.17-rc2 with some
ieee80211 / softmac patches I get
ieee80211: eth1: Unknown management packet: 112
and then the connection was broken:-( What is the 0x70 packet? Have been
using the original zd1211 vendor-based driver before,
On Sun, 28 May 2006, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
ieee80211: eth1: Unknown management packet: 112
a small addendum: below is the function from the original driver, where
they process management packets. Although they don't have special
processing for 0x70, they seem to be doing lots of stuff
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 01:21:05PM -0400, James Morris ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006, James Morris wrote:
One of the problems is that different Netlink protocols bury their
commands at different levels, so the SELinux code has to know how how deep
to dig (and then do
On Sun, 28 May 2006 07:43:10 +
Aravind Gottipati [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 02:10:17PM -0700, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
What kind of poor performance? what test? please send the output of
ethtool -e ethX and ethtool -S ethX after you've been having problems.
I
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 09:04:09AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
What is the interrupt assignment on this machine?
cat /proc/interrupts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
0: 250325IO-APIC-edge timer
1:386IO-APIC-edge i8042
8:
Francois Romieu wrote:
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
ACK, but patch won't apply:
I have regenerated it against mainline. It can be pulled from the repository
git://electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com/home/romieu/linux-2.6.git velocity
pulled, thanks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On 5/24/06, #ZHOU BIN# [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ u16 cntRTT; /* # of RTTs measured within last RTT */
+ /* veno-cntRTT = 0; */
It looks like this counter is never initialized, and the comment is deceiving.
Thomas Kho
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
GRE keys are 16-bit wide.
This looks harmless, so I've queued it for 2.6.18. Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Kho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 6:22 AM
To: #ZHOU BIN#
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TCP Veno module for kernel 2.6.16.13
On 5/24/06, #ZHOU BIN# [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ u16
13 matches
Mail list logo
