+0x24a/0x260
[x86_64_start_kernel+358/368] _sinittext+0x166/0x170
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http
with different configs.
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 11:22:40AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:30:52AM +, Sebastien Estienne wrote:
I didn't try 2.6.21 yet, but using ubuntu dapper kernel (2.6.15) i
can't reproduce the bug.
When i was using feisty kernel (2.6.20), i can reproduce in less than 5
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 04:20:32PM +0200, Sebastien Estienne wrote:
On 5/28/07, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 11:22:40AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:30:52AM +, Sebastien Estienne wrote:
I didn't try 2.6.21 yet, but using ubuntu dapper
Hi,
This series of four patches has several minor cleanups for the options to
the ip_vs_ftp modules.
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED
;
+ }
ret = register_ip_vs_app_inc(app, app-protocol, ports[i]);
if (ret)
break;
--
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body
]
When an interrupt is not handled search all handlers
for it. Intended to get systems with badly broken
--
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body
: loaded support on port[%d] = %d\n,
- app-name, i, ports[i]);
+ IP_VS_INFO(%s: loaded support on port[%d] = %d\n,
+ app-name, i, ports[i]);
}
if (ret)
--
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http
--
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 01:09:59AM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Horms wrote:
I'm not entirely sure what happens in the case of a valid port,
at best it'll be silently ignored. This patch ignores them a little
more verbosely.
Signed-Off-By: Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:44:02AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 01:09:59AM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Horms wrote:
I'm not entirely sure what happens in the case of a valid port,
at best it'll be silently ignored. This patch ignores them a little
more verbosely
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 12:29:45PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Horms wrote:
Here is the revised patch.
[IPVS] Make sure ip_vs_ftp ports are valid
I'm not entirely sure what happens in the case of a valid port,
at best it'll be silently ignored. This patch ensures that
the port
effort.
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 10:53:54PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:44:57 +0900
there are two patches floating around for this problem.
It seems that the first incarntation has been committed
to Linus's tree
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 11:46:22PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 03:15:23PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
[split]
This patch seems to be based on an old tree, I've renamed nfmark
to mark in net-2.6.20. The term fwmark and nfmark shouldn't be
used anymore.
Sorry, I based
I guess that this code used to be more complex, but replacing
the goto with a while seems to make things a bit more readable.
Or in other words, two fairly gratuitous goto are removed.
On a related note, I wonder if there should be a limit to how
many times it tries.
Signed-Off-By: Simon Horman
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:38:39AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:11:11 +0900
I guess that this code used to be more complex, but replacing
the goto with a while seems to make things a bit more readable.
Or in other words, two fairly
= pp-timeout_table[cp-state];
ip_vs_conn_put(cp);
if (p buffer+buflen) {
--
Horms http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:51:11PM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 09:47:56AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 04:11:16PM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
Instead of using the default timeout of 3 minutes, this uses the timeout
specific to the protocol
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 02:57:26PM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 12:20:54PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Sorry, I missunderstood your patch completely the first time around.
Yes I think this is an excellent idea. Assuming its tested and works
I'm happy to sign off
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 11:13:33PM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 01:38:40PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 02:57:26PM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 12:20:54PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Sorry, I missunderstood your patch
ip_vs_app.c | 28
ip_vs_lblc.c | 27 ---
ip_vs_lblcr.c | 27 ---
ip_vs_proto_tcp.c | 22 --
4 files changed, 104 deletions(-)
Please apply
--
Horms
[IPVS] remove dead code
Dave, please apply.
--
Horms
tree 60d9ec661356d90c826b9e95d9d1feac04df0ceb
parent d7ba5e23dc0661bc1e79593e0a6fbd424def3dcb
author Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:58:16 +0900
committer Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:58:16 +0900
[PATCH-2.6] cleanup IP_VS_DBG
are remnants of the 2.4 kernel and said
new abstractions. I will try to move some functionality into ip_vs.h,
which should be the only place with a large number of includes anyway.
Of course Horms has to ack all of this, but I don't think he'll object,
so long as everything still compiles
in this function. This patch removes out.
Signed-Off-By: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/net/ipv4/icmp.c b/net/ipv4/icmp.c
index be5a519..eadbd55 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/icmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/icmp.c
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static void icmp_reply(struct icmp_bxm *
u32 daddr
the ordering of the options in sysctl.txt,
so I took a wild guess about where it fits.
Signed-Off-By: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
index 2b7cf19..26364d0 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
/ip_vs_conn.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [net/ipv4/ipvs] Error 2
make[1]: *** [net/ipv4] Error 2
make: *** [net] Error 2
--
Horms
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
of it needed
to be built. So with that in mind, could you continue in the vein of
your original patch?
--
Horms
Hello,
This patch against the latest GIT HEAD reduces the includes to the
necessary ones. I've compile-tested it against following (and s/y/m/)
configuration on x86:
CONFIG_IP_VS=y
as what I posted yesterday.
--
Horms
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Dave,
please apply.
--
Horms
Hello,
This patch against the latest GIT HEAD reduces the includes to the
necessary ones. I've compile-tested it against following (and s/y/m/)
configuration on x86:
CONFIG_IP_VS=y
CONFIG_IP_VS_DEBUG=y
CONFIG_IP_VS_TAB_BITS=12
CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_TCP=y
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 12:19:32PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
please apply.
Looks bogus to me. Why are we removing linux/modules.h from ip_vs_app.c
when it uses things like EXPORT_SYMBOL?
Given that the code still compiles, I guess linux/modules.h
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:36:11PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks bogus to me. Why are we removing linux/modules.h from ip_vs_app.c
when it uses things like EXPORT_SYMBOL?
Given that the code still compiles, I guess linux/modules.h is included
in some
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 09:07:34PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
From: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 12:09:29 +0900
Unfortunately this seems like it is going to be more tedious than
we first thought. I would guess writing some sort of tool to analyse
symbols and headers
made a backport below, with the only
semi-significant change being including the ALIGN macro in orinoco.c, as it
doesn't exist in 2.4.
As yet untested
Signed-off-by: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
index 0c06b14..b99edd3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/hermes.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/hermes.c
Dean Manners notices that when an IPVS synchonisation daemons are
started the system load slowly climbs up to 1. This seems to be related
to the call to ssleep(1) (aka msleep(1000) in the main loop. Replacing
this with a call to msleep_interruptable() seems to make the problem go
away. Though I'm
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 10:35:01AM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Horms wrote:
Dean Manners notices that when an IPVS synchonisation daemons are
started the system load slowly climbs up to 1. This seems to be related
to the call to ssleep(1) (aka
Make ip_vs_sync.c = 80col wide
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
===
--- linux-2.6.orig/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c 2006-11-29 09:53:51.0
+0900
+++
This seems to be a pretty clean solution to a real problem.
Ultimately I would like to see IPVS move into the forward chain.
This seems to be a nice way to explore that, without breaking
any existing setups.
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
[IPVS
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 03:15:23PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
* Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-29 15:21
This seems to be a pretty clean solution to a real problem.
Ultimately I would like to see IPVS move into the forward chain.
This seems to be a nice way to explore that, without
that the following patch will resolve this problem.
--
Horms
[BRIDGE]: netfilter missing symbol has_bridge_parent
5dce971acf2ae20c80d5e9d1f6bbf17376870911 in Linus' tree,
otherwise known as bridge-netfilter-races-on-device-removal.patch in
2.5.15.4 removed has_bridge_parent, however this symbol is still
called
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:59:07AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Horms patch was the best of the three fixes. Dave, already applied Harald's
version, so this patch converts that to the better one.
Thanks, I was working of Linus' i2.6 tree rather than Dave's net-2.6,
so I didn't see Harald's
: pci_clone_list causes a section type
conflict
~/ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.0.3 (Debian 4.0.3-1)
~/ dpkg gcc-4.0 | grep Version
Version: 4.0.3-1
Signed-Off-By: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ne2k-pci.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
cee0890cc97247b6a9decd94f5dc0719ac8f0b1b
diff --git
Hi,
this is a small patch by Janusz Krzysztofik to ip_route_output_slow()
that allows VIP-less LVS linux director to generate packets originating
From VIP if sysctl_ip_nonlocal_bind is set.
In a nutshell, the intention is for an LVS linux director to be able
to send ICMP unreachable responses
are and what they do, you don't
have to check if you don't want to), is it appropriate for inclusion in
Documentation/networking/, and if so, should it be in ip-sysctl.txt, or
elsewhere?
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/docs/sysctl.html
--
Horms
H: http
-levels.txt from IPVS source tree into
description of ipvs_debug
* Minor spelling fixes
* Further editing more than welcome
* DaveM, do you need a 2.4 version of this document,
it will likely be a slightly different list of options?
Signed-Off-By: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Documentation
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 07:36:47PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 11:31:30 +0900
* Derived from http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/docs/sysctl.html, v1.4
maintained by Wensong Zhang
* Adjusted preample to match ip-sysctl.txt
-usecnt) 1) {};
+ IP_VS_WAIT_WHILE(atomic_read(svc-usecnt) 1);
/* call the update_service, because server weight may be changed */
svc-scheduler-update_service(svc);
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
-
To unsubscribe from this list
previous attempt, which happily showed the bogus bits
that I know about have been fixed.
--
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:25:10 +0900, Horms
* Redifed for net-2.6
* Ran through scripts/checkpatch.pl and fixed up everything
that it complains about except the use of volatile, as
its in keeping with other fields in the structure
if it is a normal entry. */
--
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
50 matches
Mail list logo
