Re: [PATCH 6/7] bonding: Add priv_flag to avoid event mishandling

2006-09-04 Thread Pawel Foremski
processed by bonding, causing various havoc. Just wanted to report that this patch solves a kernel oops on 2.6.17.11 while trying to change name of a VLAN device created on top of a bonding one. Thanks, -- Pawel Foremski [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- VGER BF report: U 0.687767 - To unsubscribe from

Re: [RFC] Ethernet Cheap Cryptography

2006-10-19 Thread Pawel Foremski
changes ... etc. I'll only add to what Dawid has said that ccrypt has been designed for direct P2P links, with single path (and no such switches on it's way). Later it turned out to be applicable for eg. small (simple) LANs or wireless ad-hoc networks. Thanks for your remarks! Bye, -- Pawel Foremski

Re: [RFC] Ethernet Cheap Cryptography

2006-10-20 Thread Pawel Foremski
Stephen J. Bevan wrote: Pawel Foremski writes: Secondly, IPsec won't decrease MSS in TCP encapsulated in PPPoE traffic, for example. Various, commercial, IPsec products decrease the MSS for TCP encapsulated in PPPoE. I've not checked the Linux 2.6 IPsec code to see if it does

Re: [RFC] Ethernet Cheap Cryptography

2006-10-21 Thread Pawel Foremski
be encrypted and some not. As I mentioned, we cannot influence the ISP in topic. More generally, I wanted to present an example of a layer-2 encapsulation that Linux does not know or (as in this case) can't modify the data in it, thus it cannot fix the TCP MSS value. -- Pawel Foremski [EMAIL

Re: [RFC] Ethernet Cheap Cryptography

2006-10-21 Thread Pawel Foremski
ccrypt, BTW. -- Pawel Foremski [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html