On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 06:10:42PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 10:44 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dave, there is a classic AB BA deadlock here.
We should break the dependency like this.
Could someone who
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 06:10:42PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
what's the exact lockdep output here?
Here's the original report:
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.20-1.2933.fc6debug #1
Thanks Dave, there is a classic AB BA deadlock here.
We should break the dependency like this.
Could someone who uses proxy ARP test this?
-
Need to drop one of the locks to avoid deadlock between
proxy arp and incoming arp receive.
---
net/core/neighbour.c | 10 +-
1 files
Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dave, there is a classic AB BA deadlock here.
We should break the dependency like this.
Could someone who uses proxy ARP test this?
Sorry Stephen, this isn't necessary. The lockdep thing is
simply confused here. It's treating
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 10:44 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dave, there is a classic AB BA deadlock here.
We should break the dependency like this.
Could someone who uses proxy ARP test this?
Sorry Stephen, this isn't necessary. The lockdep