RE: [RFC crypto v3 8/9] chtls: Register the ULP

2018-02-08 Thread Vakul Garg
ana.org.au; linux- > cry...@vger.kernel.org; ganes...@chelsio.co; netdev@vger.kernel.org; > da...@davemloft.net; Boris Pismenny <bor...@mellanox.com>; Ilya > Lesokhin <il...@mellanox.com> > Subject: RE: [RFC crypto v3 8/9] chtls: Register the ULP > > I thought about

RE: [RFC crypto v3 8/9] chtls: Register the ULP

2018-02-08 Thread Atul Gupta
31, 2018 10:14 PM To: Atul Gupta <atul.gu...@chelsio.com> Cc: s...@queasysnail.net; herb...@gondor.apana.org.au; linux-cry...@vger.kernel.org; ganes...@chelsio.co; netdev@vger.kernel.org; da...@davemloft.net; Boris Pismenny <bor...@mellanox.com>; Ilya Lesokhin <il...@mellanox.com&g

RE: [RFC crypto v3 8/9] chtls: Register the ULP

2018-01-31 Thread Atul Gupta
g; da...@davemloft.net; Boris Pismenny <bor...@mellanox.com>; Ilya Lesokhin <il...@mellanox.com> Subject: Re: [RFC crypto v3 8/9] chtls: Register the ULP On 01/31/18 04:14 PM, Atul Gupta wrote: > > > On Tuesday 30 January 2018 10:41 PM, Dave Watson wrote: > > On 01

Re: [RFC crypto v3 8/9] chtls: Register the ULP

2018-01-31 Thread Dave Watson
On 01/31/18 04:14 PM, Atul Gupta wrote: > > > On Tuesday 30 January 2018 10:41 PM, Dave Watson wrote: > > On 01/30/18 06:51 AM, Atul Gupta wrote: > > > > > What I was referring is that passing "tls" ulp type in setsockopt > > > may be insufficient to make the decision when multi HW assist

Re: [RFC crypto v3 8/9] chtls: Register the ULP

2018-01-31 Thread Atul Gupta
On Tuesday 30 January 2018 10:41 PM, Dave Watson wrote: On 01/30/18 06:51 AM, Atul Gupta wrote: What I was referring is that passing "tls" ulp type in setsockopt may be insufficient to make the decision when multi HW assist Inline TLS solution exists. Setting the ULP doesn't choose HW or SW

Re: [RFC crypto v3 8/9] chtls: Register the ULP

2018-01-30 Thread Dave Watson
On 01/30/18 06:51 AM, Atul Gupta wrote: > What I was referring is that passing "tls" ulp type in setsockopt > may be insufficient to make the decision when multi HW assist Inline > TLS solution exists. Setting the ULP doesn't choose HW or SW implementation, I think that should be done later when

RE: [RFC crypto v3 8/9] chtls: Register the ULP

2018-01-29 Thread Atul Gupta
in <il...@mellanox.com> Subject: RE: [RFC crypto v3 8/9] chtls: Register the ULP -Original Message- From: Dave Watson [mailto:davejwat...@fb.com] Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 2:39 AM To: Atul Gupta <atul.gu...@chelsio.com> Cc: herb...@gondor.apana.org.au; linux-cry...@vge

RE: [RFC crypto v3 8/9] chtls: Register the ULP

2018-01-27 Thread Atul Gupta
Boris Pismenny <bor...@mellanox.com>; Ilya Lesokhin <il...@mellanox.com> Subject: Re: [RFC crypto v3 8/9] chtls: Register the ULP <1513769897-26945-1-git-send-email-atul.gu...@chelsio.com> On 12/20/17 05:08 PM, Atul Gupta wrote: > +static void __init chtls_init_ulp_ops(void

Re: [RFC crypto v3 8/9] chtls: Register the ULP

2018-01-25 Thread Dave Watson
<1513769897-26945-1-git-send-email-atul.gu...@chelsio.com> On 12/20/17 05:08 PM, Atul Gupta wrote: > +static void __init chtls_init_ulp_ops(void) > +{ > + chtls_base_prot = tcp_prot; > + chtls_base_prot.hash= chtls_hash; > + chtls_base_prot.unhash