On Friday 03 August 2007 01:01:14 David Miller wrote:
Joakim, TEST YOUR PATCHES, and not just with your BEET test cases,
before submitting them in the future. Having normal configurations of
both PF_KEY and XFRM_USER ipsec totally break as a result of your
changes is totally unacceptable and
Although an ipsec SA was established, kernel couldn't seem to find it.
I think since we are now using x-sel.family instead of family
in the xfrm_selector_match() called in xfrm_state_find(), af_key
needs to set this field too, just as xfrm_user.
In af_key.c, x-sel.family only gets set when
From: Joy Latten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:58:38 -0500
Although an ipsec SA was established, kernel couldn't seem to find it.
I think since we are now using x-sel.family instead of family
in the xfrm_selector_match() called in xfrm_state_find(), af_key
needs to set this
