Re: why does DCCP SO_REUSEADDR have to be SOL_DCCP?

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: Em Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 05:42:23PM -0800, Rick Jones escreveu: Hi - I'm tweaking the netperf omni tests to be able to run over DCCP. I've run across a not-unorecedented problem with getaddrinfo() not groking either SOCK_DCCP or IPPROTO_DCCP in the hints, and

why does DCCP SO_REUSEADDR have to be SOL_DCCP?

Hi - I'm tweaking the netperf omni tests to be able to run over DCCP. I've run across a not-unorecedented problem with getaddrinfo() not groking either SOCK_DCCP or IPPROTO_DCCP in the hints, and that I can more or less live with - I had to do a kludge for getaddrinfo() for IPPROTO_SCTP

Re: why does DCCP SO_REUSEADDR have to be SOL_DCCP?

Em Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 05:42:23PM -0800, Rick Jones escreveu: Hi - I'm tweaking the netperf omni tests to be able to run over DCCP. I've run across a not-unorecedented problem with getaddrinfo() not groking either SOCK_DCCP or IPPROTO_DCCP in the hints, and that I can more or less live

Re: why does DCCP SO_REUSEADDR have to be SOL_DCCP?

Em Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 12:52:59AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: If instead you pass SOL_DCCP we'll go down the rabbit hole till do_dccp_setsockopt() and SO_REUSEADDR, that is equal to 2, will be interpreted as DCCP_SOCKOPT_SERVICE, that is also equal to 2, so you'll be setting the