Re: [PATCH] netdev: lockdep classes in register_netdevice Re: [patch 04/13] ppp_generic: fix lockdep warning

2007-05-15 Thread Yuriy N. Shkandybin
I've patched 2.6.22-rc1 and there was no warnings from lock debugger. Jura - Original Message - From: Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; netdev@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: [PATCH] netdev: lockdep classes in register_netdevice Re: [patch 04/13] ppp_generic: fix lockdep warning

2007-05-15 Thread Yuriy N. Shkandybin
I've patched 2.6.22-rc1 and there was no warnings from lock debugger. Jura - Original Message - From: Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; netdev@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: [IPV4] LVS: Allow to send ICMP unreachable responses when real-servers are removed

2007-05-15 Thread Janusz Krzysztofik
Simon Horman wrote: On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 07:41:48PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: So you're adding a local route for non-local destination and the address selection in icmp_send() uses the original destination address as source because the route has RTCF_LOCAL set, resulting in an error in

Re: [PATCH] netdev: lockdep classes in register_netdevice Re: [patch 04/13] ppp_generic: fix lockdep warning

2007-05-15 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:49:47PM +0400, Yuriy N. Shkandybin wrote: I've patched 2.6.22-rc1 and there was no warnings from lock debugger. Jura Many thanks, Jura! It seems reality is sometimes merciful... On the other hand I wonder, how all this could stay so long: a configuration similar

[PATCH 1/2] tbf scheduler: TSO support (update 2)

2007-05-15 Thread Hirokazu Takahashi
Hi, Hirokazu Takahashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Uhh, you are right. skb_shinfo(skb)-gso_segs and skb_shinfo(skb)-gso_size should be used. Actually forget about gso_segs, it's only filled in for TCP. I realized it was really hard to determine the actual size of each packet that will be

[PATCH 2/2] tbf scheduler: TSO support (update 2)

2007-05-15 Thread Hirokazu Takahashi
Hi, Without this patch, CBQ scheduler may cause Oops with some TSO packets because the tables passed to L2T() isn't big enough to handle such huge packets. Thanks, Hirokazu Takahashi. --- linux-2.6.21/net/sched/sch_cbq.c.ORG2007-05-14 20:53:06.0 +0900 +++

Panic in ieee_80211_ibss_add_sta when trying to join ad-hoc network (rt2500pci)

2007-05-15 Thread David LAMPARTER
Hello, while trying to get my wireless to work (a Ralink RT2560, as sold in a Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo A 1630), I've been hitting the following Panic twice: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer derference at virtual address 0218 [...] EIP is at ieee80211_ibss_add_sta+0xae/0x130 [...] EIP:

Re: [IPV4] LVS: Allow to send ICMP unreachable responses when real-servers are removed

2007-05-15 Thread Patrick McHardy
Simon Horman wrote: On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 07:41:48PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: So you're adding a local route for non-local destination and the address selection in icmp_send() uses the original destination address as source because the route has RTCF_LOCAL set, resulting in an error in

Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits

2007-05-15 Thread Roland Dreier
As I said before, getting multiple packets in one call to xmit would be nice for amortizing per-xmit overhead in IPoIB. So it would be nice if the cases where the stack does GSO ended up passing all the segments into the driver in one go. Well TCP does upto 64k -- that is what

Re: [patch 1/1] icom: Add new sub-device-id to support new adapter

2007-05-15 Thread wendy xiong
Hi Andrew, I have tested this with new adapter on our systems. I didn't get comments since I sent out last Wednesday. Could you help me with this patch? Thank you very much! Wendy On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 17:36 -0500, wendy xiong wrote: This patch add new sub-device-id to support new adapter and

Re: [patch 1/1] icom: Add new sub-device-id to support new adapter

2007-05-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 15 May 2007 11:29:15 -0500 wendy xiong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have tested this with new adapter on our systems. I didn't get comments since I sent out last Wednesday. Could you help me with this patch? You sent it to the wrong mailing list: netdev doesn't handle serial drivers.

select(0, ..) is valid ?

2007-05-15 Thread Badari Pulavarty
Hi, Is select(0, ..) is a valid operation ? I see that there is no check to prevent this or return success early, without doing any work. Do we need one ? slub code is complaining that we are doing kmalloc(0). Thanks, Badari [ cut here ] Badness at

Re: Panic in ieee_80211_ibss_add_sta when trying to join ad-hoc network (rt2500pci)

2007-05-15 Thread John W. Linville
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 05:28:42PM +0200, David LAMPARTER wrote: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer derference at virtual address 0218 [...] EIP is at ieee80211_ibss_add_sta+0xae/0x130 [...] EIP: [c05773fe] ieee_80211_ibss_add_sta+0xae/0x130 SS:ESP 0068:f641dc38 Kernel panic -

Re: select(0, ..) is valid ?

2007-05-15 Thread Mark Glines
On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:29:18 -0700 Badari Pulavarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is select(0, ..) is a valid operation ? select(0, ..) is rather commonly used as a portable sleep() with microsecond granularity. Disabling it will break lots of things. Mark - To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: select(0, ..) is valid ?

2007-05-15 Thread Jiri Slaby
Badari Pulavarty napsal(a): Hi, Is select(0, ..) is a valid operation ? Yes, it was (is) sometimes used for measuring (sleeping for) short time slices. regards, -- http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/Jiri Slaby faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz e-mail: jirislaby

Re: select(0, ..) is valid ?

2007-05-15 Thread Alan Cox
On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:29:18 -0700 Badari Pulavarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is select(0, ..) is a valid operation ? Yes. It's a fairly classic old BSD way to do timeouts Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: select(0, ..) is valid ?

2007-05-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:29:18 -0700 Badari Pulavarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is select(0, ..) is a valid operation ? Probably - it becomes an elaborate way of doing a sleep. Whatever - we used to permit it without error, so we should continue to do so. I see that there is no check to

Re: select(0, ..) is valid ?

2007-05-15 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Badari Pulavarty wrote: Hi, Is select(0, ..) is a valid operation ? I see that there is no check to prevent this or return success early, without doing any work. Do we need one ? slub code is complaining that we are doing kmalloc(0). select(0, ...) is valid, and is functionally

Re: select(0, ..) is valid ?

2007-05-15 Thread Badari Pulavarty
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 10:44 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:29:18 -0700 Badari Pulavarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is select(0, ..) is a valid operation ? Probably - it becomes an elaborate way of doing a sleep. Whatever - we used to permit it without error,

Re: select(0, ..) is valid ?

2007-05-15 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: I _think_ we can just do --- a/fs/compat.c~a +++ a/fs/compat.c @@ -1566,9 +1566,13 @@ int compat_core_sys_select(int n, compat */ ret = -ENOMEM; size = FDS_BYTES(n); - bits = kmalloc(6 * size, GFP_KERNEL); - if

Re: select(0, ..) is valid ?

2007-05-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 15 May 2007 11:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 15 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: I _think_ we can just do --- a/fs/compat.c~a +++ a/fs/compat.c @@ -1566,9 +1566,13 @@ int compat_core_sys_select(int n, compat */ ret = -ENOMEM;

Re: select(0, ..) is valid ?

2007-05-15 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: Perhaps putting a size=0 detector into slab also would speed this process up. Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: linux-2.6/mm/slab.c === ---

Re: Panic in ieee_80211_ibss_add_sta when trying to join ad-hoc network (rt2500pci)

2007-05-15 Thread Michael Wu
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 13:12, John W. Linville wrote:\ Patch below...does this work better? Looks like upstream needs it too... ACK. Looks like I forgot to set sdata after removing the code that set it. Thanks, -Michael Wu pgpG4koPmIL63.pgp Description: PGP signature

mac80211 ad-hoc: carrier not set up [was: Panic in ieee_80211_ibss_add_sta]

2007-05-15 Thread David Lamparter
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 01:12:02PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: Patch below...does this work better? Looks like upstream needs it too... Yup, this fixes it. Thanks for the quick fix. However, ad-hoc still does not work, since the network device's carrier status does not seem to be properly

Re: [PATCH 15/17] sky2: only disable 88e8056 on some boards

2007-05-15 Thread kernel
Hello, Stephen, RE: sky2 88e8056 Gigabyte GA-965GM-S2 uATX motherboard A couple days ago I posted my observations that this was a hardware problem. My boards are now working! I used the GIGABYTE MOTHERBOARD webpage for SUPPORT. They replied with a EEPROM program for the Marvell Yukon

[PATCH] don't put multicasts with mc_ttl=0 on the wire

2007-05-15 Thread akepner
A colleague of mine found that multicasts with a ttl of 0 can be sent on the wire. This happens if the sender doesn't belong to the destination multicast group. With the following the multicast ttl is respected whether or not the sender belongs to the destination multicast group.

Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits

2007-05-15 Thread David Miller
From: Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 09:25:28 -0700 I'll have to think about implementing that for IPoIB. One issue I see is if I have, say, 4 free entries in my send queue and skb_gso_segment() gives me back 5 packets to send. It's not clear I can recover at that

[PATCH] mac80211: avoid null ptr deref in ieee80211_ibss_add_sta

2007-05-15 Thread John W. Linville
avoid sdata null pointer dereference in ieee80211_ibss_add_sta. Signed-off-by: John W. Linville [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/mac80211/ieee80211_sta.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_sta.c b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_sta.c index

Re: [PATCH] don't put multicasts with mc_ttl=0 on the wire

2007-05-15 Thread David Miller
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:56:02 -0700 A colleague of mine found that multicasts with a ttl of 0 can be sent on the wire. This happens if the sender doesn't belong to the destination multicast group. With the following the multicast ttl is respected whether or not

Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits

2007-05-15 Thread Roland Dreier
I'll have to think about implementing that for IPoIB. One issue I see is if I have, say, 4 free entries in my send queue and skb_gso_segment() gives me back 5 packets to send. It's not clear I can recover at that point -- I guess I have to check against gso_segs in the xmit routine

Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits

2007-05-15 Thread Michael Chan
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 13:52 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: Well, IPoIB doesn't do netif_wake_queue() until half the device's TX queue is free, so we should get batching. However, I'm not sure that I can count on a fudge factor ensuring that there's enough space to handle everything

Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits

2007-05-15 Thread Roland Dreier
Well, IPoIB doesn't do netif_wake_queue() until half the device's TX queue is free, so we should get batching. However, I'm not sure that I can count on a fudge factor ensuring that there's enough space to handle everything skb_gso_segment() gives me -- is there any reliable way to

Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits

2007-05-15 Thread Roland Dreier
I thought to enable GSO, device driver actually does nothing rather than enabling the flag. GSO moved TCP offloading to interface layer before device xmit. It's a different idea with multiple packets per xmit. GSO still queue the packet one bye one in QDISC and xmit one bye one. The

Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits

2007-05-15 Thread Michael Chan
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 14:08 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: Well, IPoIB doesn't do netif_wake_queue() until half the device's TX queue is free, so we should get batching. However, I'm not sure that I can count on a fudge factor ensuring that there's enough space to handle everything

Re: [PATCH] Intel IXP4xx network drivers v.2 - Ethernet and HSS

2007-05-15 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:45:53PM +0100, Michael-Luke Jones wrote: No-one is saying that this driver should not be mainlined before it has LE support. All that I said was: Personally I'd like LE ethernet tested and working before we push. The alternative would be to explicitly state

Re: select(0, ..) is valid ?

2007-05-15 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote: On Tue, 15 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: I _think_ we can just do --- a/fs/compat.c~a +++ a/fs/compat.c @@ -1566,9 +1566,13 @@ int compat_core_sys_select(int n, compat */ ret = -ENOMEM; size = FDS_BYTES(n); - bits

Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits

2007-05-15 Thread David Miller
From: Michael Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:05:28 -0700 On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 14:08 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: Well, IPoIB doesn't do netif_wake_queue() until half the device's TX queue is free, so we should get batching. However, I'm not sure that I can count

Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits

2007-05-15 Thread David Miller
From: Shirley Ma [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:22:57 -0700 I just wonder without TSO support in HW, how much benefit we can get by pushing GSO from interface layer to device layer besides we can do multiple packets in IPoIB. I bet the gain is non-trivial. I'd say about

Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits

2007-05-15 Thread Roland Dreier
Shirley I just wonder without TSO support in HW, how much Shirley benefit we can get by pushing GSO from interface layer to Shirley device layer besides we can do multiple packets in IPoIB. The entire benefit comes from having multiple packets to queue in one call to the xmit

Re: [PATCH] don't put multicasts with mc_ttl=0 on the wire

2007-05-15 Thread David Stevens
Arthur, I assume you're making use of the hack mentioned in route.c: ... This hack is not just for fun, it allows vic, vat and friends to work. They bind socket to loopback, set ttl to zero and expect that it will work. I don't know the details of the intent for this hack, but

Re: [PATCH 15/17] sky2: only disable 88e8056 on some boards

2007-05-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 15 May 2007 15:43:39 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Stephen, RE: sky2 88e8056 Gigabyte GA-965GM-S2 uATX motherboard A couple days ago I posted my observations that this was a hardware problem. My boards are now working! I used the GIGABYTE MOTHERBOARD webpage for

Re: [patch 1/4] pasemi_mac: Fix register defines

2007-05-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some shift values were obviously wrong. Fix them to correspond with the masks. Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] applied 1-4 to #upstream-fixes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: [patch/resend] smc911x: fix compilation breakage

2007-05-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
Vitaly Wool wrote: Looks like the new version of this patch has been overlooked, so I'm resending it. It just adapts the driver to the new IRQ API according to what Russell has pointed out. drivers/net/smc911x.c |6 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH 3/5] ucc_geth: eliminate max-speed, change interface-type to phy-connection-type

2007-05-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
Kim Phillips wrote: It was agreed that phy-connection-type was a better name for the interface-type property, so this patch renames it. Also, the max-speed property name was determined too generic, and is therefore eliminated in favour of phy-connection-type derivation logic. includes

Re: mac80211 ad-hoc: carrier not set up [was: Panic in ieee_80211_ibss_add_sta]

2007-05-15 Thread Ivo van Doorn
Hi, However, ad-hoc still does not work, since the network device's carrier status does not seem to be properly set. (It remains in NO-CARRIER even after wlan0: Selected IBSS BSSID 92:68:a2:db:de:45 based on configured SSID. I dirtily hacked around that with the following two-liner: I was

[WIP] [PATCH] WAS Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits

2007-05-15 Thread jamal
On Tue, 2007-15-05 at 14:32 -0700, David Miller wrote: An efficient qdisc--driver transfer during netif_wake_queue() could help solve some of that, as is being discussed here. Ok, heres the approach i discussed at netconf. It needs net-2.6 and the patch i posted earlier to clean up

[PATCH 0/6] skge/sky2 patches for 2.6.21.2

2007-05-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
This is a backport of all the bugfixes in 2.6.22-rc1 (or later) to 2.6.21.y -- Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH 4/6] sky2: 88e8071 support not ready

2007-05-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
The driver is not ready to support 88e8071 chip, it requires several more changes (not done yet). If this chip is present, system will hang on boot. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/sky2.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) ---

[PATCH 1/6] skge: allow WOL except for known broken chips

2007-05-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Wake On Lan works correctly on Yukon-FE and other variants. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]a --- drivers/net/skge.c |9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- linux-2.6.21.y.orig/drivers/net/skge.c 2007-05-10 12:10:38.0 -0700 +++

[PATCH 3/6] sky2: allow 88E8056

2007-05-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
It looks like the problems of Gigabyte 88E8056 are unique to that chip motherboard and maybe fixable by EEPROM update. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/sky2.c |3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) --- linux-2.6.21.y.orig/drivers/net/sky2.c 2007-05-15

[PATCH 6/6] sky2: fix oops on shutdown

2007-05-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
If the device fails during module startup for some reason like unsupported chip version then the driver would crash dereferencing a null pointer, on shutdown or suspend/resume. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/sky2.c | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 10

[PATCH 5/6] skge: crash on shutdown/suspend

2007-05-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
If device fails during module startup for some reason (like unsupported chip version) then driver would crash dereferencing a null pointer, on shutdown or suspend/resume. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/skge.c |9 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

[PATCH 2/6] skge: default WOL should be magic only

2007-05-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
By default, the skge driver now enables wake on magic and wake on PHY. This is a bad default (bug), wake on PHY means machine will never shutdown if connected to a switch. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]a --- drivers/net/skge.c |4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1

[PATCH] [NET] Add constant for FCS/CRC length (frame check sequence)

2007-05-15 Thread Auke Kok
From: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] About a dozen drivers that have some form of crc checksumming or offloading use this constant, warranting a global define for it. Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/linux/if_ether.h |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Re: [WIP] [PATCH] WAS Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits

2007-05-15 Thread jamal
On Tue, 2007-15-05 at 18:17 -0400, jamal wrote: I will post a patch for tun device in a few minutes that i use to test on my laptop (i need to remove some debugs) to show an example. Ok, here it is. The way i test is to point packets at a tun device. [One way i do it is attach an ingress

[PATCH] use default 32768-61000 outgoing port range in all cases

2007-05-15 Thread Mark Glines
Hi, I noticed I had chopped off a whole comment, when I meant to only remove part of it. So I've fixed that. This is a reissued use-high-ports-for-local-stuff.diff, with a comment fix. Does anyone have a problem with this patch in its current form? Any chance of applying it? This diff changes

Re: smp_affinity, MSI-X and 2.6.21.1

2007-05-15 Thread Rick Jones
Andi Kleen wrote: That's true, but we are talking about software state so in some sense it might be better that the affinity-to-be is reported to the user in this case. Delayed register updates are an implementation detail the user does not need to know about here. This patch should fix it.

Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits

2007-05-15 Thread David Miller
From: Shirley Ma [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:33:22 -0700 That's interesting. So a generic LRO in interface layer will benefit the preformance more, right? Receiving path TCP N times is more expensive than sending, I think. If you look at some of the drivers doing LRO,

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-05-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/pasemi_mac.c | 45 +++ drivers/net/pasemi_mac.h |4 +-

Re: [IPV4] LVS: Allow to send ICMP unreachable responses when real-servers are removed

2007-05-15 Thread Julian Anastasov
Hello, On Tue, 15 May 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote: Simon Horman wrote: On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 07:41:48PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: So you're adding a local route for non-local destination and the address selection in icmp_send() uses the original destination address as

[PATCH] [e1000] Lower the MSI unavailable message to INFO priority

2007-05-15 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Currently, if MSI is enabled but unavailable the e1000 prints an error message Unable to allocate MSI interrupt Error with ERR priority. This is confusing to users since this is not a functionality error; the driver will immediately afterwards try to acquire a conventional PIC/APIC interrupt and

[PATCH 1/1] [TIPC]: Fixed erroneous introduction of for_each_netdev

2007-05-15 Thread Jon Paul Maloy
Signed-off-by: Jon Paul Maloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/tipc/eth_media.c | 10 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/tipc/eth_media.c b/net/tipc/eth_media.c index 0ee6ded..c73c206 100644 --- a/net/tipc/eth_media.c +++ b/net/tipc/eth_media.c @@ -120,18

Re: [PATCH 1/1] [TIPC]: Fixed erroneous introduction of for_each_netdev

2007-05-15 Thread David Miller
From: Jon Paul Maloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:21:14 -0400 Signed-off-by: Jon Paul Maloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry about that Jon, I thought the new code was correct :-/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] [e1000] Lower the MSI unavailable message to INFO priority

2007-05-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
H. Peter Anvin wrote: diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c index 637ae8f..089ae3f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ static int e1000_request_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter) if

Re: [WIP] [PATCH] WAS Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits

2007-05-15 Thread jamal
On Tue, 2007-15-05 at 18:48 -0400, jamal wrote: I will try to post the e1000 patch tonight or tommorow morning. I have the e1000 path done; a few features from the 2.6.18 missing (mainly the one mucking with tx ring pruning on the tx path). While it compiles and looks right - i havent tested it

[PATCH (take 2)] netdev: lockdep classes in register_netdevice Re: [patch 04/13] ppp_generic: fix lockdep warning

2007-05-15 Thread Jarek Poplawski
Sorry - I've fogotten about something very important! (Plus a small change in the diff.) Jarek P. --- (take 2) After initializing dev-_xmit_lock register_netdevice() sets lockdep class according to dev-type. Idea of this patch - by David Miller. Reported tested by: Yuriy N. Shkandybin [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] netdev: lockdep classes in register_netdevice Re: [patch 04/13] ppp_generic: fix lockdep warning

2007-05-15 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:49:47PM +0400, Yuriy N. Shkandybin wrote: I've patched 2.6.22-rc1 and there was no warnings from lock debugger. So, you mean only this one patch - without previous vlan patch? Very interesting... Thanks once more, Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: [PATCH (take 2)] netdev: lockdep classes in register_netdevice Re: [patch 04/13] ppp_generic: fix lockdep warning

2007-05-15 Thread David Miller
From: Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 07:40:00 +0200 After initializing dev-_xmit_lock register_netdevice() sets lockdep class according to dev-type. Idea of this patch - by David Miller. Reported tested by: Yuriy N. Shkandybin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: