Re: latest netdev tree - (broadcom44 bug?) letting you know...

2005-08-05 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 11:51:02PM +0200, Mateusz Berezecki wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Nothing in that tree has changed the b44 driver... Ok, so I will try to find out what has changed as soon as I have some more time also please ignore forwarded e-mail. I just updated the

Re: [Bluetooth] recursive locking in l2cap_sock_accept/bt_accept_dequeue

2006-09-17 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 02:18:26PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: Hi Pekka, Got this from a 2.6.18rc7-based fedora-devel kernel: = [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 2.6.17-1.2647.fc6 #1 sdpd/4955 is trying to acquire lock:

Re: TKIP encryption should allocate enough tailroom

2007-01-18 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:46:35AM -0500, Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote: Having further reviewed my code, I have changed my mind; the ieee80211_crypt_tkip routines are not designed to be responsible for creating enough headroom and tailroom. The hostap driver should be doing this. In fact, I

Re: TKIP encryption should allocate enough tailroom

2007-01-19 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:55:37AM -0500, Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote: to debugging messages! In some circumstances, debug messages are always produced; in several others, net_ratelimit() is called to decided whether to print an error (but why in these cases and not others?); and in many

Re: sky2 freezes the system

2006-01-23 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:00:17 -0800 Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:16:40 +0300 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8053 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 19) What is the chip revision, reported on dmesg output.

sky2 rx error (was: Re: sky2 freezes the system)

2006-01-24 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 08:03:15PM +0200, Pekka Pietikainen wrote: The box is a Nexcom NSA 1086 with 4x skge ports and 4x sky2. acpi=off made the driver work apparently, haven't used it with much load yet, though. Ran the box for a while with some load (the sky2 ports on the box are only used

Re: [PATCH 0/9] sky2: version 0.14

2006-01-26 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 04:28:44PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: Mostly a collection of bug fixes. The most critical is the pci express fix. Also adds Message Signaled Interrupt and entropy support. Patches seemed to be mangled. Actually having a version I want people to test tarball would be

skge bridge hw csum failure (Was: Re: [BUG] sky2 broken for Yukon PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller 11ab:4362 (rev 19))

2006-01-30 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:22:42PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: OK, although we can't rule out sky2/netfilter from the enquiry, I've identified two bugs in ppp/pppoe that may be responsible for what you are seeing. So please try the following patch and let us know if the problem still exists (or

Re: sky2 rx error (was: Re: sky2 freezes the system)

2006-01-31 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:36:29PM +0200, Pekka Pietikainen wrote: On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 08:03:15PM +0200, Pekka Pietikainen wrote: The box is a Nexcom NSA 1086 with 4x skge ports and 4x sky2. acpi=off made the driver work apparently, haven't used it with much load yet, though. Ran the box

Re: sky2 rx error (was: Re: sky2 freezes the system)

2006-02-03 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:45:18PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: The driver doesn't handle overlength packets properly. Someone maybe sending you jumbo frames or some other crap. The vendor driver doesn't handle over size frames either; it just resets itself every 5 seconds so you don't

Missing VLAN tags in bnx2

2007-02-28 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
Just had to spend some time figuring out why a bnx2 card connected to a switch monitor port didn't see any vlan tags (when in our scenario the tags are pretty vital). Found the following explanation: [BNX2]: Fix VLAN on ASF Always set up the device to strip incoming VLAN tags when ASF

airo: inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} - {in-hardirq-W} usage.

2006-08-08 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
Only aironet lockdep related report I could find was http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdevm=115406279721287w=2 this looks a bit different: Linux version 2.6.17-1.2528.fc6 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.1 20060802 (Red Hat 4.1.1-14)) #1 SMP Sun Aug 6 01:43:42 EDT 2006

Re: airo: inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} - {in-hardirq-W} usage.

2006-08-08 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:16:13PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: Pekka Pietikainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Only aironet lockdep related report I could find was http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdevm=115406279721287w=2 this looks a bit different: Linux version 2.6.17-1.2528.fc6

Re: airo: inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} - {in-hardirq-W} usage.

2006-08-14 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 02:38:51PM +0300, Pekka Pietikainen wrote: Hmm... I retried with a 2.6.18rc4-based rawhide kernel and the warning is still there, previous one was rc3-git7. Could be http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdevm=115461336523555w=2 which isn't upstream yet, right

Re: tcp bw in 2.6

2007-10-03 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
outside the equipment most people have. Having a dedicated transatlantic 2.5Gbps connection found a really fun one a long time ago ;) -- Pekka Pietikainen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http

Re: tcp bw in 2.6

2007-10-03 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
, balancing between latency and bulk performance so the acks might be fine (thousands vs. tens of thousands/sec) -- Pekka Pietikainen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo

Re: [2.6 patch] remove Documentation/networking/net-modules.txt

2007-10-29 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
enabled. And probably others too. Then again, the information there isn't wrong, it's just totally useless these days :P -- Pekka Pietikainen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org

protocol 0300 is buggy spam in dmesg when injectingcapturing on same interface

2008-02-18 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
When playing with some L2 level fuzzing I started getting lots of protocol 0300 is buggy, dev eth3 spew in dmesg. That interface is also capturing the traffic that's being sent, that's probably why the dev_queue_xmit_nit codepath is getting called in the first place. Tested on

Re: protocol 0300 is buggy spam in dmesg when injectingcapturing on same interface

2008-02-19 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 05:39:03PM +0200, Pekka Pietikainen wrote: When playing with some L2 level fuzzing I started getting lots of protocol 0300 is buggy, dev eth3 spew in dmesg. That interface is also capturing the traffic that's being sent, that's probably why the dev_queue_xmit_nit