Re: [PATCH 19/28] brcmfmac: avoid maybe-uninitialized warning in brcmf_cfg80211_start_ap

Arnd Bergmann writes: > On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 9:49:58 AM CEST Kalle Valo wrote: >> Arnd Bergmann writes: >> >> > A bugfix added a sanity check around the assignment and use of the >> > 'is_11d' variable, which looks correct to me, but as the function is

Re: [PATCH 19/28] brcmfmac: avoid maybe-uninitialized warning in brcmf_cfg80211_start_ap

On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 9:49:58 AM CEST Kalle Valo wrote: > Arnd Bergmann writes: > > > A bugfix added a sanity check around the assignment and use of the > > 'is_11d' variable, which looks correct to me, but as the function is > > rather complex already, this confuses the

Re: [PATCH 19/28] brcmfmac: avoid maybe-uninitialized warning in brcmf_cfg80211_start_ap

Arnd Bergmann writes: > A bugfix added a sanity check around the assignment and use of the > 'is_11d' variable, which looks correct to me, but as the function is > rather complex already, this confuses the compiler to the point where > it can no longer figure out if the variable