Re: stable nftables kernel changes for port to 3.12 kernel

2018-12-05 Thread Pablo Neira Ayuso
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 12:59:43AM +0200, Pavel Melnik wrote: > Hi > > > I'd just change NF_IP6_PRI_RAW to -450 and use ip6tables rules in raw > > table. > > We will try, thanks Have a look at: commit 902d6a4c2a4f411582689e53fb101895ffe99028 Author: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan Date: Wed

Re: stable nftables kernel changes for port to 3.12 kernel

2018-12-04 Thread Pavel Melnik
Hi I'd just change NF_IP6_PRI_RAW to -450 and use ip6tables rules in raw table. We will try, thanks nft add table ip6 filter nft add chain ... and so on. I have tried this, but no effect .. Regards, Pavel

Re: stable nftables kernel changes for port to 3.12 kernel

2018-12-04 Thread Florian Westphal
Pavel Melnik wrote: > We were asked to implement functionality to drop fragmented IPv6 packets, > addressed to local interface, on device based 3.12 kernel Urgh. I'd just change NF_IP6_PRI_RAW to -450 and use ip6tables rules in raw table. > But we observed the 'same' issue if try to use

stable nftables kernel changes for port to 3.12 kernel

2018-12-04 Thread Pavel Melnik
Hi We were asked to implement functionality to drop fragmented IPv6 packets, addressed to local interface, on device based 3.12 kernel As I understand it's not possible to do this by ip6tables rule in the case when nf_conntrack is enabled, but it possible if use nftables Could you please