Re: [netlogo-devel] add a `sequence` primitive?

2015-08-10 Thread Jason Bertsche
Is there any sympathy for this? There is; I agree that this is a desirable thing to have in the language. However, I fear that the addition would be far from trivial, unfortunately. Here some big issues that I see with implementing this primitive: *1) Primitives are not first-class

Re: [netlogo-devel] add a `sequence` primitive?

2015-08-10 Thread Seth Tisue
see also https://github.com/NetLogo/NetLogo/issues/539 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups netlogo-devel group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to netlogo-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more

Re: [netlogo-devel] add a `sequence` primitive?

2015-08-10 Thread Alan Isaac
On Monday, August 10, 2015 at 6:59:01 PM UTC-4, Seth Tisue wrote: see also https://github.com/NetLogo/NetLogo/issues/539 I don't like the `apply` proposal as well as the `sequence` proposal, but it points to the same issue, even if it offers a less general solution. The existence of the