Re: [netmod] 'uses' as a sub-statement to 'choice' statement?

>This has already been discussed, see > >https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=netmod=1=uF7kbBPMxIBAMUm03D3AqxaJvK4 Okay, good answer. Never mind. Thanks, Kent ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org

Re: [netmod] 'uses' as a sub-statement to 'choice' statement?

Hi, I do not think this is a bug. The uses-stmt has no node name, just a grouping name, which may have a prefix. In the example above 'ethernet' and 'optical' are forced to be local names and be unique local names. Andy On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Kent Watsen wrote:

[netmod] Yang mount / ysdl example use case

I thought it would be worth summarizing what we're looking for in our draft, draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-02 (note new version in case you missed it) with respect to the draft-lhotka-netmod-ysdl and draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount drafts. This is just my view, so my co-authors may

Re: [netmod] chars that require quoting

> On 03 Feb 2016, at 05:02, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 02 Feb 2016, at 18:25, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Jernej Tuljak

Re: [netmod] Yang mount / ysdl example use case

> On 03 Feb 2016, at 03:24, Kent Watsen wrote: > > > [Chair hat on] > > Given the number of competing/complementing drafts involved, and the general > lack of discussion on any of them, a virtual interim meeting might be an > expedient way to proceed. In fairness, we

Re: [netmod] IPR Check: draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-01

"Carl Moberg (camoberg)" wrote: > > I am not aware of any IPR. Me neither. /martin > > > On Jan 26, 2016, at 4:26 PM, Benoit Claise (bclaise) > > wrote: > > > > I'm not aware of any IPR. > > > > Regards, Benoit > >> This mail starts the IPR poll

[netmod] Last Call: (Terminology and Requirements for Enhanced Handling of Operational State) to Informational RFC

The IESG has received a request from the NETCONF Data Modeling Language WG (netmod) to consider the following document: - 'Terminology and Requirements for Enhanced Handling of Operational State' as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits

Re: [netmod] chars that require quoting

> On 02 Feb 2016, at 09:51, Jernej Tuljak wrote: > > Martin Bjorklund je 1.2.2016 ob 20:48 napisal: >> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: >>> If a specification is not explicit enough, then people often implement >>> what they find

Re: [netmod] chars that require quoting

Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 02 Feb 2016, at 09:51, Jernej Tuljak wrote: > > > > Martin Bjorklund je 1.2.2016 ob 20:48 napisal: > >> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > >>> If a specification is not explicit enough,

Re: [netmod] minor question - YANG Document Guidelines: Imports

> On 02 Feb 2016, at 12:21, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Robert Wilton wrote: >> On 28/01/2016 20:01, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 01:57:22PM -0500, Joel M. Halpern wrote: I ran into something while reading a YANG

Re: [netmod] chars that require quoting

> On 02 Feb 2016, at 12:16, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> On 02 Feb 2016, at 09:51, Jernej Tuljak wrote: >>> >>> Martin Bjorklund je 1.2.2016 ob 20:48 napisal: Juergen Schoenwaelder

Re: [netmod] chars that require quoting

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Jernej Tuljak wrote: > Ladislav Lhotka je 2.2.2016 ob 12:25 napisal: > >> On 02 Feb 2016, at 12:16, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >>> >>> Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >>> On 02 Feb 2016, at 09:51, Jernej Tuljak

[netmod] 'uses' as a sub-statement to 'choice' statement?

In a model where the choice shorthand notation is being used, it is necessary to use longhand notation if wanting a case statement to be defined by the ‘uses’ statement. That is, 6020bis allows ‘uses’ as a sub-statement to the ‘case’ statement, but not to the ‘choice’ statement. As an

Re: [netmod] chars that require quoting

> On 02 Feb 2016, at 18:25, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Jernej Tuljak > wrote: > Ladislav Lhotka je 2.2.2016 ob 12:25 napisal: > On 02 Feb 2016, at 12:16, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Ladislav

Re: [netmod] chars that require quoting

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 02 Feb 2016, at 18:25, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Jernej Tuljak > wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka je 2.2.2016 ob 12:25 napisal: > >

Re: [netmod] Yang mount / ysdl example use case

[Chair hat on] Given the number of competing/complementing drafts involved, and the general lack of discussion on any of them, a virtual interim meeting might be an expedient way to proceed. In fairness, we know that there has been some discussion, but it hasn’t been picked up yet in a big

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-04.txt

Dear all, I started the IETF last call process on draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-04. Regards, Benoit [Speaking as co-chair] Benoit, I believe the document is now ready for your AD review. —Tom On Jan 22, 2016:8:37 PM, at 8:37 PM, Kent Watsen