Re: [netmod] Protocol Action: 'The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14.txt)

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:54 AM, The IESG wrote: > The IESG has approved the following document: > - 'The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language' > (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14.txt) as Proposed Standard > > This document is the product of the NETCONF Data Modeling

Re: [netmod] Opstate solutions discussions: update and request for WGinput

Hi All I'd like to support Option B below. >> B) no explicit support is required for models to support >>applied configuration -- and that the WG needs to >>formalize an opstate solution based on the approach >>discussed in [4] and [5]. Thanks Kiran >> All, >> >> We

Re: [netmod] Opstate solutions discussions: update and request for WGinput

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Lou Berger wrote: > Tom, > > Thanks for the perspective. I'm a little unsure if you're expecting > a response or just making a statement, so if you're looking for > something specific and don't see it below -- please let me know. > > On

Re: [netmod] Opstate solutions discussions: update and request for WGinput

Tom, Thanks for the perspective. I'm a little unsure if you're expecting a response or just making a statement, so if you're looking for something specific and don't see it below -- please let me know. On 6/17/2016 11:15 AM, t.petch wrote: > Lou > > By now, 17th June, I see solid support

[netmod] Protocol Action: 'The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document: - 'The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language' (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the NETCONF Data Modeling Language Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Benoit Claise and Joel Jaeggli. A URL

Re: [netmod] partial review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-08.txt

Then this probably needs to be more clearly spelled out. /js On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 01:34:31PM +, Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA) wrote: > Hi Juergen, > > This model may be used in cases where no events are sent on any wire. Only > events sent on a 'remote' log-action would need to conform to

Re: [netmod] Opstate solutions discussions: update and request for WGinput

Lou By now, 17th June, I see solid support for one option but only see comments from a somewhat small number of participants The majority of the authors of the 172 YANG files I have in an archive are probably unaware of this discussion and yet some at least will be affected. What concerns me is

[netmod] bits lexical representation

RFC 6020bis Section 9.7.2 is silent on the question of whether bit names can be repeated in a bits value, e.g is “uno dos dos tres” valid or invalid? Obviously repetition is not to be encouraged but is it forbidden? Maybe this is a case where the robustness principle should be applied? Thanks,

[netmod] YANG 1.1 - draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14.txt ready

Benoit, Martin has posted revision -14 and I (in my role as document shepherd) believe -14 addresses all comments that we received during the IESG process. Please press any necessary buttons to continue the process. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone:

[netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the NETCONF Data Modeling Language of the IETF. Title : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language Author : Martin Bjorklund Filename:

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1: must-stmt evaluation in input, output, notification

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:58:48PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Anyway, I think my original proposed fix to this issue should work: > > OLD: > >o The context node is the node in the accessible tree for which the > "must" statement is defined. > > NEW: > >o If the "must"

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1: must-stmt evaluation in input, output, notification

Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 16 Jun 2016, at 15:58, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> > >>> On 16 Jun 2016, at 15:12, Andy Bierman wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 8:30

Re: [netmod] partial review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-08.txt

In ietf-syslog-types, there is a mapping of facility names to a limited number space on the wire. Unfortunately, this mapping is not available in a machine readable form. But for those names listed in RFC 5424, there is at least a mapping defined in human readable form in the description clauses.