Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text

> rather confusing, since this notation is not defined anywhere. A bit, yes. I tried to get the syntax defined in RD, but my co-authors didn't think it was necessary. I acquiesced as well just to move things along. > If the term 'state' added any value, we would use it more often, but I

Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: > >> I know that we tend to be sloppy in meetings and often in emails but > >> in written RFCs (specifications) I would personally prefer to use a > >> single term. > > > > So change it in the RD draft to the term we

Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text

>> I know that we tend to be sloppy in meetings and often in emails but >> in written RFCs (specifications) I would personally prefer to use a >> single term. > > So change it in the RD draft to the term we actually use "operational > datastore". A lot of effort went into defining the terms.

Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:24:17AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > Except that we never use that term. > > It is always called operational datastore when we talk about it in > meetings. > >

Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:24:17AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > > Except that we never use that term. > It is always called operational datastore when we talk about it in meetings. > Hence, the new NMDA terms section: > > ** NMDA Terms > > The following terms are defined in the > Network

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

Lada, On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400: >> Lada, >> >> On 8/28/2017 9:30 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Can you please take a look at it and see if we have any other disconnects? >>> This is really scary. >> I agree! >> >>> How can

Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text

Thanks! On 8/28/2017 2:54 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Lou Berger > wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > > On 8/28/2017 12:24 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > 4.23.1.  Combining Operational State and Configuration Data >

Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Lou Berger wrote: > Hi Andy, > > > On 8/28/2017 12:24 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > 4.23.1. Combining Operational State and Configuration Data > > > > > >If possible, operational state SHOULD be combined with its > associated > > >

Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text

Hi Andy, On 8/28/2017 12:24 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > 4.23.1.  Combining Operational State and Configuration Data > > > >    If possible, operational state SHOULD be combined with its associated > >    configuration data.  This prevents duplication of key leafs and > >    ancestor nodes.  It

Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 06:08:28PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here is the proposed rewrite of 4.23. > > I changed a few details in the temporary non-NMDA procedure. > > This

Re: [netmod] Potential additions to rfc6087bis: RegEx guidelines

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:58:59PM +, Xufeng Liu wrote: > > [Xufeng] [0..9] is still compliant with the XSD pattern specified by > YANG 1.0 and 1.1. Using [0..9] instead of [\d] will make the > implementations with native POSIX RegEx easier without the need for > a tool to inspect every

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

Lada, On 8/28/2017 9:30 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Can you please take a look at it and see if we have any other disconnects? > This is really scary. I agree! > How can we expect poor data modellers to understand the > concept if we have such fundamental disconnects, after so many hours of >

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 08:54 -0400: > > On 8/28/2017 7:35 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Lou Berger wrote: > > > Martin, > > > See below. > > > > > > On 08/28/2017 06:28 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > Lou Berger wrote: > > > > > Martin,

Re: [netmod] Potential additions to rfc6087bis: RegEx guidelines

> -Original Message- > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de] > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 8:53 AM > To: Xufeng Liu > Cc: Per Hedeland ; Ladislav Lhotka ; > 'netmod@ietf.org' >

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

On 8/28/2017 7:35 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Lou Berger wrote: >> Martin, >> See below. >> >> On 08/28/2017 06:28 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >>> Lou Berger wrote: Martin, See below On August 23, 2017 2:28:37 AM Martin

[netmod] YumaPro SDK 17.10-B3 and yanglint 0.13.49 upgraded on claise.be

Dear all, With these two upgrades, we received way more warnings. Most comes from yanglint, to be candid. Please check your YANG modules at http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html About 50 YANG modules PASSED previously and now report PASSED WITH WARNINGS. It's great that

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-13 - section 4.26.2

-Original Message- From: Martin Bjorklund [mailto:m...@tail-f.com] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 1:12 PM To: Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) Cc: netmod@ietf.org Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-13 - section 4.26.2 Hi, "Bogaert, Bart (Nokia -

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

Lou Berger wrote: > Martin, > See below. > > On 08/28/2017 06:28 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Lou Berger wrote: > >> Martin, > >> See below > >> > >> > >> On August 23, 2017 2:28:37 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote: > >> > >>> Lou Berger

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

Martin, See below. On 08/28/2017 06:28 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Lou Berger wrote: >> Martin, >> See below >> >> >> On August 23, 2017 2:28:37 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote: >> >>> Lou Berger wrote: Hi Martin, See

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-13 - section 4.26.2

Hi, "Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" wrote: > I would like to understand why the YANG 1.1 feature logic is *much more > expensive* than YANG 1.0. The document says "much more _expressive_". > As far as I can see the way YANG features are > being defined has not

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

Lou Berger wrote: > Martin, > See below > > > On August 23, 2017 2:28:37 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > Lou Berger wrote: > >> Hi Martin, > >> > >> See below. > >> > >> > >> On 8/22/2017 6:20 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> >

Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 06:08:28PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > Hi, > > Here is the proposed rewrite of 4.23. > I changed a few details in the temporary non-NMDA procedure. > This module cannot duplicate the NMDA module as read-only. > Only the top-level config=false nodes that would have been

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-04

Hi, Lou Berger wrote: > Authors, Contributors, WG, > > As part of the preparation for WG Last Call: > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm