Hi,
The use-cases for groupings/uses and augment are not identical.
Alternative NMDA Approach:
I don't see a big difference between defining YANG for an artifact vs.
defining some YANG for a special-purpose datastore.
There is nothing about the YANG data that is different.
There are only
>> Gotcha. What do other people think, would a "uses-yang-data"
>> statement be generally more useful?
>
> But does this mean we also do uses-yang-container, uses-yang-list,
> uses-yang-xyz to other definitions as well? I do not think this is
> desirable and why would yang-data be any
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 10:39:57AM +, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> >
> > This is not an effort to change or bifurcate the YANG 1.1. It is simply
> to
> > RECOMMEND a proper subset of XSD
On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 10:39:57AM +, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>
> This is not an effort to change or bifurcate the YANG 1.1. It is simply to
> RECOMMEND a proper subset of XSD pattern that is more portable.
>
If you implement YANG as it is defined, pattern are portable. Given
this, I do
Juergen,
On 9/2/17, 3:33 AM, "netmod on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder"
wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 10:45:51AM +0100, Robert Wilton wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>>
>> On 01/09/2017 00:57, Alex Campbell wrote:
>> >
>> >
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 05:44:01PM +0100, Robert Wilton wrote:
>
> First question: How many pattern statements in draft and standard IETF YANG
> modules actually use Unicode properties (e.g \p{}).
> Answer: Just 2. To add a zone at the end of the IPv4/IPv6 address.
>
> E.g. pattern
>
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 10:45:51AM +0100, Robert Wilton wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
>
> On 01/09/2017 00:57, Alex Campbell wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I'd be very wary of adding guidelines that restrict the regex syntax.
> >
> >
> > A tool that supports YANG must implement the full regex