On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 08:33:58PM +, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> Juergen writes:
> > Kent writes:
> >> I don't understand talk about abandoning this draft. There is no question
> >> that it is needed (e.g., anima vouch, zerotouch, tail-f's "structure"),
> >> and RFC 8040 is unsatisfactory
Juergen writes:
> Kent writes:
>> I don't understand talk about abandoning this draft. There is no question
>> that it is needed (e.g., anima vouch, zerotouch, tail-f's "structure"),
>> and RFC 8040 is unsatisfactory because 1) it doesn't allow a top-level
>> 'choice' between two containers and
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 05:57:34PM +, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> I don't understand talk about abandoning this draft. There is no question
> that it is needed (e.g., anima vouch, zerotouch, tail-f's "structure"),
> and RFC 8040 is unsatisfactory because 1) it doesn't allow a top-level
> 'choice'
