Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Anees Shaikh wrote: > I'm afraid I missed the discussion of tags at recent IETF meetings where > this may have been covered. In my read of this draft, I'm still not sure > what the intended use cases are (i.e., is #hashtag ubiquity really the > primary

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 1:17 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: > On 9/26/18 09:23, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:09 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder > > > > wrote: > > > > > It is even worse than a step backwards. > > The draft specifies a

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

On 9/26/18 09:23, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:09 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder > > wrote: > > It is even worse than a step backwards. > The draft specifies a lot of details about module tag conformance > that needs to be present

[netmod] Important milestones for IETF 103

Folks, Important upcoming milestones for the IETF 103 Bankok meeting include: 2018-10-05 - Agenda published, and we will know when we are meeting. 2018-10-22 - Draft submission deadline, 2 weeks out from meeting. 2018-10-24 - Working group agendas due. 2018-11-03 - Meeting commences

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-wu-netmod-base-notification-nmda-00.txt

NMDA Base Notification has been updated based on discussion in last meeting and comments on the list And resubmitted to Netmod WG as v-00 draft. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wu-netmod-base-notification-nmda-00 Your review and comments are welcome. -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: