Re: [netmod] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-14: (with COMMENT)

Thanks Ben. -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: Benjamin Kaduk [mailto:ka...@mit.edu] 发送时间: 2020年4月28日 0:07 收件人: Qin Wu 抄送: The IESG ; draft-ietf-netmod-factory-defa...@ietf.org; netmod-cha...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org; Kent Watsen 主题: Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (6031)

+1. > On Apr 24, 2020, at 12:39 PM, Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) > wrote: > > That seems like a reasonable approach to me. > Jason > > From: netmod On Behalf Of Rob Wilton (rwilton) > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 3:34 PM > To: Kent Watsen ; netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod]

Re: [netmod] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-14: (with COMMENT)

Hi Qin, The new updates look good, thanks. -Ben On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 02:52:15AM +, Qin Wu wrote: > Hi, Ben: > -邮件原件- > 发件人: Benjamin Kaduk [mailto:ka...@mit.edu] > 发送时间: 2020年4月25日 3:37 > 收件人: Qin Wu > 抄送: The IESG ; draft-ietf-netmod-factory-defa...@ietf.org; >

[netmod] yang-module-versioning: revision-label scheme

Hi, There was a discussion on the need to have an extension which specifies which versioning scheme a module is using. The authors have identified 2 options:

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (6031)

Thanks. I’ll wait until Friday for any further comments. Thanks, Rob From: Kent Watsen Sent: 24 April 2020 22:09 To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) Cc: netmod@ietf.org Subject: Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (6031) Yes, better, thanks! K. On Apr 24, 2020, at 3:33 PM, Rob Wilton

Re: [netmod] "uint24" in rfc6991-bis?

From: netmod on behalf of Martin Björklund Sent: 23 April 2020 10:57 "Rob Wilton \(rwilton\)" wrote: > [As an individual contributor] > > > -Original Message- > > From: netmod On Behalf Of Juergen > > Schoenwaelder > > Sent: 22 April 2020 23:09 > > To: Robert Varga > > Cc: