I have reviewed this document. I believe it is in good shape and ready to
proceed toward publication.
Cheers,
Charles
> On Feb 3, 2022, at 6:54 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> Dear NETMOD WG,
>
> This message begins a two-week WGLC for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11
> ending on Friday, Februar
+1
B.
On 2/14/2022 11:49 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
I have followed the discussions on this draft and believe it is ready
for publication.
On Thursday, February 3, 2022, 09:54:23 PM EST, Kent Watsen
wrote:
Dear NETMOD WG,
This message begins a two-week WGLC for
draft-ietf-netmod-
Hi, all
I have read the document and support the publication of this work.
I have only one comment: It seems that Table 2 doesn’t list all the types
defined in “ietf-inet-types” YANG module, e.g., protocol-number,
ip-address-link-local, ip-address-and-prefix… Should this be fixed?
Best Regards,
Andy Bierman writes:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 1:19 AM Jan Lindblad (jlindbla)
> wrote:
>
>> Just to add to the complexity here, it's not only about identityrefs.
>>
>> People (including IETF) have also defined types that use qname:s inside
>> YANG strings, which the servers and clients would ha
