Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with DISCUSS)

2018-10-17 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Hi, Eric Rescorla wrote: > OK, after reading your explanation and the example, I think I am clearer on > the use case and the text you propose seems appropriate. Why don't you > provide a new ID and I'll clear my DISCUSS Thank you! I have fixed this and uploaded a new version (draft-ietf-netmod

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with DISCUSS)

2018-10-16 Thread joel jaeggli
On 10/16/18 14:51, Eric Rescorla wrote: > OK, after reading your explanation and the example, I think I am clearer > on the use case and the text you propose seems appropriate. Why don't > you provide a new ID and I'll clear my DISCUSS Thanks I think the authors will have that out shortly. joel

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with DISCUSS)

2018-10-16 Thread Eric Rescorla
OK, after reading your explanation and the example, I think I am clearer on the use case and the text you propose seems appropriate. Why don't you provide a new ID and I'll clear my DISCUSS -Ekr On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:05 AM joel jaeggli wrote: > On 10/16/18 06:00, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > I

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with DISCUSS)

2018-10-16 Thread joel jaeggli
On 10/16/18 06:00, Eric Rescorla wrote: > I'm sorry, but I still don't think I understand the security impacts of > this well enough to know if this text is OK. > > Can you provide a more detailed explanation of what XPath expressions > can and cannot do here? Happy to discuss live either on the p

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with DISCUSS)

2018-10-16 Thread Eric Rescorla
I'm sorry, but I still don't think I understand the security impacts of this well enough to know if this text is OK. Can you provide a more detailed explanation of what XPath expressions can and cannot do here? Happy to discuss live either on the phone or in BKK -Ekr On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 5:4

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with DISCUSS)

2018-10-16 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Hi, Eric Rescorla wrote: > That seems like it's going to have some pretty surprising consequences and > at minimum needs more information in the Security Considerations. Ok. Howabout we add a paragraph to the end of the Security Considerations section: Care must be taken when the "parent-ref

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with DISCUSS)

2018-10-11 Thread Eric Rescorla
That seems like it's going to have some pretty surprising consequences and at minimum needs more information in the Security Considerations. On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:18 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Eric Rescorla wrote: > > I'm sorry but I don't understand this. > > > > Does the externally vis

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with DISCUSS)

2018-10-11 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Eric Rescorla wrote: > I'm sorry but I don't understand this. > > Does the externally visible behavior of any mounted module depend in any > way on these XPATH references Yes, but note that these XPath expressions ("parent-reference") are read-only (config false in the YANG model). Thus they ar

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with DISCUSS)

2018-10-10 Thread Eric Rescorla
I'm sorry but I don't understand this. Does the externally visible behavior of any mounted module depend in any way on these XPATH references -Ekr On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 6:38 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Eric Rescorla wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 5:32 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote: > >

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with DISCUSS)

2018-10-10 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Eric Rescorla wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 5:32 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for > > > draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: Discuss > > > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line inta

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with DISCUSS)

2018-10-10 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 5:32 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Hi, > > Eric Rescorla wrote: > > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: Discuss > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with DISCUSS)

2018-10-10 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Hi, Eric Rescorla wrote: > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory p

[netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with DISCUSS)

2018-10-09 Thread Eric Rescorla
Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to h