Jan, do you have an issue with the choice of the letter or its semantics? It
has been mentioned that it's confusing to have 'm' and 'M'.
Regards,
Reshad.
On 2020-05-13, 10:45 AM, "netmod on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke)"
wrote:
> On May 13, 2020, at 10:04, Jan Lindblad
> On May 13, 2020, at 10:04, Jan Lindblad wrote:
>
> Joe,
>
> Thanks for sending this out to a wider audience. Sorry I missed the meeting
> yesterday. That particular time of week is very popular.
>
> I think the text you propose below is good; I have no issues. For the record,
> I do have
Joe,
Thanks for sending this out to a wider audience. Sorry I missed the meeting
yesterday. That particular time of week is very popular.
I think the text you propose below is good; I have no issues. For the record, I
do have some issue relating to other pieces, especially around the use of
There has been recent discussion about how to handle applying versions to new
modules, modules in development, and revisions to modules that previously did
not have a revision-label. Below is proposed text to offer both general and
IETF-specific guidelines for this. The intent is to place
