Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02

2018-10-17 Thread Vladimir Vassilev
: Rohit R Ranade Cc: Christian Hopps ; netmod@ietf.org Subject: Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02 On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:46:03AM +, Rohit R Ranade wrote: I think we need to define a subtree for non-NMDA clients to get the operational tags. It is not much of a change for

Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02

2018-10-17 Thread Christian Hopps
that the draft needs the changes. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de] >> Sent: 17 October 2018 18:18 >> To: Rohit R Ranade >> Cc: Christian Hopps ; netmod@ietf.org >> Subject: Re:

Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02

2018-10-17 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
fined tags. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder > > [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de] > > Sent: 17 October 2018 17:22 > > To: Rohit R Ranade > > Cc: Christian Hopps ; netmod@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [netmod] R

Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02

2018-10-17 Thread Rohit R Ranade
: Christian Hopps ; netmod@ietf.org Subject: Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02 Obviously, this is now a slightly different statement. There are NMDA transition guidelines that have been discussed at length and finally been integated into https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod

Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02

2018-10-17 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
nade > Cc: Christian Hopps ; netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02 > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:46:03AM +, Rohit R Ranade wrote: > > > I think we need to define a subtree for non-NMDA clients to get the > > operational tags. &

Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02

2018-10-17 Thread Rohit R Ranade
Cc: Christian Hopps ; netmod@ietf.org Subject: Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02 On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:46:03AM +, Rohit R Ranade wrote: > I think we need to define a subtree for non-NMDA clients to get the > operational tags. It is not much of a change for a _clie

Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02

2018-10-17 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:46:03AM +, Rohit R Ranade wrote: > I think we need to define a subtree for non-NMDA clients to get the > operational tags. It is not much of a change for a _client_ to read a different datastore hence I do not think this is needed. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder

Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02

2018-10-17 Thread Rohit R Ranade
age- From: Christian Hopps [mailto:cho...@chopps.org] Sent: 17 October 2018 14:08 To: Rohit R Ranade Cc: Christian Hopps ; netmod@ietf.org Subject: Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02 > On Oct 17, 2018, at 12:09 AM, Rohit R Ranade wrote: > > 1. In the desrciption of leaf-lis

Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02

2018-10-17 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Christian Hopps wrote: > > > > On Oct 17, 2018, at 12:09 AM, Rohit R Ranade > > wrote: > > > > 1. In the desrciption of leaf-list tag > > " > > The operational view of this list will contain all > > user-configured tags as well as any predefined tags that > > have

Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02

2018-10-17 Thread Christian Hopps
> On Oct 17, 2018, at 12:09 AM, Rohit R Ranade wrote: > > 1. In the desrciption of leaf-list tag > " > The operational view of this list will contain all > user-configured tags as well as any predefined tags that > have not been masked by the user using the masked

[netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02

2018-10-16 Thread Rohit R Ranade
1. In the desrciption of leaf-list tag " The operational view of this list will contain all user-configured tags as well as any predefined tags that have not been masked by the user using the masked-tag leaf list below. " ==> So the predefined tags, sh